All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
	Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
	Stefan Chulski <stefanc@marvell.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform-msi: Free descriptors in platform_msi_domain_free()
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:39:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180924153938.4047e1b1@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86r2hovwrq.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Hi Marc,

Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote on Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:39:21
+0100:

> Hi Miquel,
> 
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 16:01:29 +0100,
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Since the addition of platform MSI support, there were two helpers
> > supposed to allocate/free IRQs for a device:
> > 
> >     platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs()
> >     platform_msi_domain_free_irqs()
> > 
> > In these helpers, IRQ descriptors are allocated in the "alloc" routine
> > while they are freed in the "free" one.
> > 
> > Later, two other helpers have been added to handle IRQ domains on top
> > of MSI domains:
> > 
> >     platform_msi_domain_alloc()
> >     platform_msi_domain_free()
> > 
> > Seen from the outside, the logic is pretty close with the former
> > helpers and people used it with the same logic as before: a
> > platform_msi_domain_alloc() call should be balanced with a
> > platform_msi_domain_free() call. While this is probably what was
> > intended to do, the platform_msi_domain_free() does not remove/free
> > the IRQ descriptor(s) created/inserted in
> > platform_msi_domain_alloc().
> > 
> > One effect of such situation is that removing a module that requested
> > an IRQ will let one orphaned IRQ descriptor (with an allocated MSI
> > entry) in the device descriptors list. Next time the module will be
> > inserted back, one will observe that the allocation will happen twice
> > in the MSI domain, one time for the remaining descriptor, one time for
> > the new one. It also has the side effect to quickly overshoot the
> > maximum number of allocated MSI and then prevent any module requesting
> > an interrupt in the same domain to be inserted anymore.
> > 
> > This situation has been met with loops of insertion/removal of the
> > mvpp2.ko module (requesting 15 MSIs each time).
> > 
> > Fixes: 552c494a7666 ("platform-msi: Allow creation of a MSI-based stacked irq domain")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/base/platform-msi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> > index 60d6cc618f1c..b9d9d1729215 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> > @@ -354,6 +354,20 @@ platform_msi_create_device_domain(struct device *dev,
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void platform_msi_domain_free_descs(struct irq_domain *domain, int virq,
> > +					   int nvec)
> > +{
> > +	struct platform_msi_priv_data *data = domain->host_data;
> > +	struct msi_desc *desc, *tmp;
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, tmp, dev_to_msi_list(data->dev), list) {
> > +		if (desc->irq >= virq && desc->irq < (virq + nvec)) {
> > +			list_del(&desc->list);
> > +			free_msi_entry(desc);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * platform_msi_domain_free - Free interrupts associated with a platform-msi
> >   *                            domain
> > @@ -375,6 +389,8 @@ void platform_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> >  
> >  		irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, desc->irq, 1);
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	platform_msi_domain_free_descs(domain, virq, nvec);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> >   
> 
> Good catch, but I wonder why you don't use the existing
> helper instead. Something like this (untested):
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> index 60d6cc618f1c..87808ac08bfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> @@ -375,6 +375,8 @@ void platform_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
>  
>  		irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, desc->irq, 1);
>  	}
> +
> +	platform_msi_free_descs(data->dev, virq, nvec);

First I tried exactly what you propose, however
platform_msi_free_descs() takes a "base" IRQ number which is not the
Linux global virq number but the local MSI domain index.

virq (in the above example) is checked against desc->platform.msi_index
(0, 1, 2, ... 29) while in the function I wrote, virq is checked
against desc->irq (12, 13, ..., 19, 26, 27, ..., 48).


If you prefer not to add a "platform_msi_domain_free_descs()" helper,
I see another solution which is to use desc->platform.msi_index instead
of virq, and put platform_msi_free_descs() inside the
for_each_msi_entry() loop (making it _safe otherwise it would crash
for each destroyed descriptor in the list).

See the below code.

I personally prefer the function in my first proposal which avoids
calling platform_msi_free_descs() once for each descriptor to free.



diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
index b9d9d1729215..fb9aa6fcdad9 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
@@ -380,17 +380,16 @@ void platform_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
                              unsigned int nvec)
 {
        struct platform_msi_priv_data *data = domain->host_data;
-       struct msi_desc *desc;
-       for_each_msi_entry(desc, data->dev) {
+       struct msi_desc *desc, *tmp;
+       for_each_msi_entry_safe(desc, tmp, data->dev) {
                if (WARN_ON(!desc->irq || desc->nvec_used != 1))
                        return;
                if (!(desc->irq >= virq && desc->irq < (virq + nvec)))
                        continue;
 
                irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, desc->irq, 1);
+               platform_msi_free_descs(data->dev, desc->platform.msi_index, 1);
        }
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
index 5839d8062dfc..be8ec813dbfb 100644
--- a/include/linux/msi.h
+++ b/include/linux/msi.h
@@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ struct msi_desc {
        list_first_entry(dev_to_msi_list((dev)), struct msi_desc, list)
 #define for_each_msi_entry(desc, dev)  \
        list_for_each_entry((desc), dev_to_msi_list((dev)), list)
+#define for_each_msi_entry_safe(desc, tmp, dev)        \
+       list_for_each_entry_safe((desc), (tmp), dev_to_msi_list((dev)), list)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
 #define first_pci_msi_entry(pdev)      first_msi_entry(&(pdev)->dev)



Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-24 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-07 15:01 [PATCH] platform-msi: Free descriptors in platform_msi_domain_free() Miquel Raynal
2018-09-20 18:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-09-24 13:39   ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2018-09-28  8:34     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-09-28 15:10       ` Miquel Raynal
     [not found]         ` <86k1moubgr.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
2018-10-11  9:17           ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180924153938.4047e1b1@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanc@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.