All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: me@tobin.cc (Tobin C. Harding)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: dev process - reduce mistakes
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:03:54 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180925060354.GL32365@eros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO1P-kBObF0KYNgFkrV9BNr99X0hu2Gt88ishdRPG8hgt5ncMw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:01:19PM -0400, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> On 9/18/18, Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm after some advice from those more experienced with [kernel]
> > development please.
> >
> > What systems do you have in place to help catch mistakes?  In other
> > words; what processes do you use when coding and submitting patches to
> > help eliminate simple mistakes?  So far my best method is getting a
> > patch [set] ready then waiting until the next day before reviewing the
> > set and submitting.  I am facing an issue where by when doing (less than
> > super interesting) large patch sets (like docs fixes) that by the time I
> > get to the final review my eyes glaze over and I'm still missing
> > mistakes.
> >
> > My future maintainers will thank you ;)
> 
> 
> For the docs part of what you're doing, *I* read what I write out loud
> and deliberately very slowly so that I actually see each word. I
> *empathize* with you. I experience something similar regarding my
> often long winded emails. I'll proofread literally 10 or 15 times then
> see that one last mistake...
> 
> That I MISSED... as the email is disappearing out of sight because it
> has just been sent to a listserv. :D
> 
> Reading out loud **slower** than I normally would helps me see AND
> hear mistakes. If I read at a normal speed, even if I do so out loud,
> it's some kind of a Human nature thing that I'll keep reading my
> mistakes wrongly by mentally "glossing over" those mistakes instead of
> seeing them for the oopsies they are. Instead of catching those
> mistakes and fixing them, I just keep saying them WRONG out loud over
> and over (AND over) if I do so at a normal conversational speaking
> speed. :))
> 
> Have fun!
> 
> Cindy :)

Awesome, thanks Cindy.  Just the sort of tip I was after.

thanks,
Tobin.

      reply	other threads:[~2018-09-25  6:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-18 23:35 dev process - reduce mistakes Tobin C. Harding
2018-09-19  0:01 ` valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
2018-09-19  2:15   ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-09-19  2:01 ` Cindy-Sue Causey
2018-09-25  6:03   ` Tobin C. Harding [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180925060354.GL32365@eros \
    --to=me@tobin.cc \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.