Re: [PATCH v3.1 1/2] device property: Add device_get_bd_address() and fwnode_get_bd_address()

[Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>]

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 02:36:25PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 12:10:13PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * fwnode_get_bd_address - Get the Bluetooth Device Address (BD_ADDR) from the
> > + *                         firmware node
> > + * @fwnode:	Pointer to the firmware node
> > + * @bd_addr:	Pointer to struct to store the BD address in
> > + *
> > + * Search the firmware node for 'local-bd-address'.
> > + *
> > + * All-zero BD addresses are rejected, because those could be properties
> > + * that exist in the firmware tables, but were not updated by the firmware. For
> > + * example, the DTS could define 'local-bd-address', with zero BD addresses.
> > + */
> > +int fwnode_get_bd_address(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, bdaddr_t *bd_addr)
> > +{
> > +	bdaddr_t ba;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(fwnode, "local-bd-address",
> > +					    (u8 *)&ba, sizeof(bdaddr_t));
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +	if (is_zero_ether_addr((u8 *)&ba))
> > +		return -ENODATA;
> > +
> > +	memcpy(bd_addr, &ba, sizeof(bdaddr_t));
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_get_bd_address);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * device_get_bd_address - Get the Bluetooth Device Address (BD_ADDR) for a
> > + *                         given device
> > + * @dev:	Pointer to the device
> > + * @bd_addr:	Pointer to struct to store the BD address in
> > + */
> > +int device_get_bd_address(struct device *dev, bdaddr_t *bd_addr)
> > +{
> > +	return fwnode_get_bd_address(dev_fwnode(dev), bd_addr);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_bd_address);
> 
> Let's not fill property.c with framework specific helper functions any
> more!
> 
> Those functions are completely bluetooth specific, so they do not
> belong here. The fact that some other framework already managed to
> slip their helpers in does not justify others to do the same.

You have a point, I'll see if I can find a better place.

Thanks

Matthias