From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Dave Gerlach" <d-gerlach@ti.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>, "Tero Kristo" <t-kristo@ti.com>,
"Benoît Cousson" <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Update am437x and am335x dts to probe with ti-sysc
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:31:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926233111.GY5662@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfc3f1db-9468-ed92-a673-882b51b4dec8@ti.com>
* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [180926 21:41]:
> On 09/26/2018 11:23 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > +static int __maybe_unused omap_i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct omap_i2c_dev *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + /* Is device still enabled because of autosuspend? */
> > + if (ddata->is_suspended)
> > + return 0;
>
> Sry, but you can't do this. There is no sync between suspend and PM runtime.
>
>
> > +
> > + /* Paired with call in omap_i2c_resume() */
> > + error = pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(dev);
>
> This is nop!!! More over, in general you can't predict how many times pm_runtime_get was called and
> what's the current value of usage_count.
Hmm yeah that's a good point.
> To make things work the pm_runtime_force_xx() have to be used, or
> like with omap_device, platform/bus code have to handle device state
> at suspend_no_irq stage.
OK. So looks like the other i2c bus drivers have already solved it
with simply SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS which is along the lines
you're suggesting.
The following works for me, does it look OK to you?
Regards,
Tony
8< ---------------------
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
@@ -1498,8 +1498,7 @@ static int omap_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM
-static int omap_i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+static int __maybe_unused omap_i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct omap_i2c_dev *omap = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -1525,7 +1524,7 @@ static int omap_i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
return 0;
}
-static int omap_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
+static int __maybe_unused omap_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct omap_i2c_dev *omap = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -1540,20 +1539,18 @@ static int omap_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
}
static const struct dev_pm_ops omap_i2c_pm_ops = {
+ SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend,
+ pm_runtime_force_resume)
SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(omap_i2c_runtime_suspend,
omap_i2c_runtime_resume, NULL)
};
-#define OMAP_I2C_PM_OPS (&omap_i2c_pm_ops)
-#else
-#define OMAP_I2C_PM_OPS NULL
-#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
static struct platform_driver omap_i2c_driver = {
.probe = omap_i2c_probe,
.remove = omap_i2c_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "omap_i2c",
- .pm = OMAP_I2C_PM_OPS,
+ .pm = &omap_i2c_pm_ops,
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(omap_i2c_of_match),
},
};
--
2.19.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Update am437x and am335x dts to probe with ti-sysc
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:31:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926233111.GY5662@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfc3f1db-9468-ed92-a673-882b51b4dec8@ti.com>
* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [180926 21:41]:
> On 09/26/2018 11:23 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > +static int __maybe_unused omap_i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct omap_i2c_dev *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + /* Is device still enabled because of autosuspend? */
> > + if (ddata->is_suspended)
> > + return 0;
>
> Sry, but you can't do this. There is no sync between suspend and PM runtime.
>
>
> > +
> > + /* Paired with call in omap_i2c_resume() */
> > + error = pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(dev);
>
> This is nop!!! More over, in general you can't predict how many times pm_runtime_get was called and
> what's the current value of usage_count.
Hmm yeah that's a good point.
> To make things work the pm_runtime_force_xx() have to be used, or
> like with omap_device, platform/bus code have to handle device state
> at suspend_no_irq stage.
OK. So looks like the other i2c bus drivers have already solved it
with simply SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS which is along the lines
you're suggesting.
The following works for me, does it look OK to you?
Regards,
Tony
8< ---------------------
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
@@ -1498,8 +1498,7 @@ static int omap_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM
-static int omap_i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+static int __maybe_unused omap_i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct omap_i2c_dev *omap = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -1525,7 +1524,7 @@ static int omap_i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
return 0;
}
-static int omap_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
+static int __maybe_unused omap_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct omap_i2c_dev *omap = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -1540,20 +1539,18 @@ static int omap_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
}
static const struct dev_pm_ops omap_i2c_pm_ops = {
+ SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend,
+ pm_runtime_force_resume)
SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(omap_i2c_runtime_suspend,
omap_i2c_runtime_resume, NULL)
};
-#define OMAP_I2C_PM_OPS (&omap_i2c_pm_ops)
-#else
-#define OMAP_I2C_PM_OPS NULL
-#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
static struct platform_driver omap_i2c_driver = {
.probe = omap_i2c_probe,
.remove = omap_i2c_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "omap_i2c",
- .pm = OMAP_I2C_PM_OPS,
+ .pm = &omap_i2c_pm_ops,
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(omap_i2c_of_match),
},
};
--
2.19.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-26 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-25 0:05 [PATCH 0/4] Update am437x and am335x dts to probe with ti-sysc Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 0:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 0:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dts: am437x: Add l4 interconnect hierarchy and ti-sysc data Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 0:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 0:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: dts: am437x: Move l4 child devices to probe them with ti-sysc Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 0:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-04 12:23 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-12-04 12:23 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-12-04 18:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-04 18:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-04 23:18 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-04 23:18 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-05 6:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-12-05 19:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-05 19:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-05 23:02 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-05 23:02 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-07 12:46 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-09-25 0:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: am335x: Add l4 interconnect hierarchy and ti-sysc data Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 0:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-27 14:56 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-27 14:56 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 0:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: am335x: Move l4 child devices to probe them with ti-sysc Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 0:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-11-27 13:03 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-11-27 13:03 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-11-27 16:16 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-11-27 16:16 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-11-28 12:52 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-11-28 12:52 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-11-29 19:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-11-29 19:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 5:14 ` [PATCH 0/4] Update am437x and am335x dts to probe " Keerthy
2018-09-25 5:14 ` Keerthy
2018-09-25 14:40 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 14:40 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 17:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 17:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-25 21:16 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-09-25 21:16 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-09-26 4:08 ` Keerthy
2018-09-26 4:08 ` Keerthy
2018-09-26 15:59 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-26 15:59 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-26 16:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-26 16:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-26 21:36 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-09-26 21:36 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-09-26 23:31 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2018-09-26 23:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-27 4:55 ` Keerthy
2018-09-27 4:55 ` Keerthy
2018-09-27 14:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-27 14:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-27 21:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-27 21:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-10-01 16:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-10-01 16:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-10-04 4:29 ` Keerthy
2018-10-04 4:29 ` Keerthy
2018-10-04 14:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-10-04 14:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-27 19:11 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-09-27 19:11 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-09-27 19:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-27 19:38 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180926233111.GY5662@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.