From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: virtio-dev-return-4876-cohuck=redhat.com@lists.oasis-open.org Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Received: from lists.oasis-open.org (oasis-open.org [10.110.1.242]) by lists.oasis-open.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C63985DA3 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:17:11 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20180927121621-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20180918122052.349ba42e.cohuck@redhat.com> <20180918093310-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20180918151337.GA7432@vbusired-dt> <20180918111540-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20180919230502-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20180920220951-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v4] content: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature To: Sameeh Jubran Cc: loseweigh@gmail.com, venu.busireddy@oracle.com, cohuck@redhat.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, virtio-dev List-ID: On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:17:37AM +0300, Sameeh Jubran wrote: > What do you think about the following alternative implementation which > uses cross id validation. > > -device virtio-net,standby=,id= > -vfio #address,id=,primary= virtio is a standby device, isn't it? Besides that I don't see issues with this API. -- MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org