From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:12:27 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Randy Dunlap CC: , , , , , , , , , , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Suresh Siddha , "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 11/19] x86/sgx: Add wrappers for ENCLS leaf functions Message-ID: <20180927131227.GB5436@linux.intel.com> References: <20180925130845.9962-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20180925130845.9962-12-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: Sender: Return-Path: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 List-ID: On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 01:01:47PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Hi, > Please don't use "/**" to begin comment blocks that are not kernel-doc > notation, like the 3 below. Note: I might have seen one (or some) of > these "fixed" in other patches in this series (not sure). Thanks Randy. /Jarkko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 11/19] x86/sgx: Add wrappers for ENCLS leaf functions Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:12:27 +0300 Message-ID: <20180927131227.GB5436@linux.intel.com> References: <20180925130845.9962-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20180925130845.9962-12-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: x86@kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, serge.ayoun@intel.com, shay.katz-zamir@intel.com, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Suresh Siddha , "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 01:01:47PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Hi, > Please don't use "/**" to begin comment blocks that are not kernel-doc > notation, like the 3 below. Note: I might have seen one (or some) of > these "fixed" in other patches in this series (not sure). Thanks Randy. /Jarkko