All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Cc: kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: iwlegacy: Fix possible data races in il4965_send_rxon_assoc()
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:54:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181005075403.GC1931@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <988494cb-c121-697e-b502-ea4e7c601f47@gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:52:19PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> On 2018/10/4 15:59, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 10:07:45PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> >>These possible races are detected by a runtime testing.
> >>To fix these races, the mutex lock is used in il4965_send_rxon_assoc()
> >>to protect the data.
> >Really ? I'm surprised by that, see below.
> 
> My runtime testing shows that il4965_send_rxon_assoc() and
> il4965_configure_filter() are concurrently executed.
> But after seeing your reply, I need to carefully check whether my
> runtime testing is right, because I think you are right.
> In fact, I only monitored the iwl4965 driver, but did not monitor
> the iwlegacy driver, so I will do the testing again with monitoring
> the lwlegacy driver.
<snip>
> >So I wonder how this patch did not cause the deadlock ?
> 
> Oh, sorry, anyway, my patch will cause double locks...

So how those runtime test were performend such you didn't
notice this ?

> >Anyway what can be done is adding:
> >
> >lockdep_assert_held(&il->mutex);
> >
> >il4965_commit_rxon() to check if we hold the mutex.
> 
> I agree.

Care to post a patch ?

Thanks
Stanislaw

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-05  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-03 14:07 [PATCH] net: wireless: iwlegacy: Fix possible data races in il4965_send_rxon_assoc() Jia-Ju Bai
2018-10-04  7:59 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2018-10-04  8:52   ` Jia-Ju Bai
2018-10-05  7:54     ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2018-10-05 13:42       ` Jia-Ju Bai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181005075403.GC1931@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.