From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 22:46:06 +1000 Message-ID: <20181005224606.2372fece@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20181005161406.73ef8727@canb.auug.org.au> <87d0sok3dm.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/Vss.RuVkbVq2Ytp_cX61Awd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87d0sok3dm.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Andrew Morton , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , PowerPC , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Christophe Leroy List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org --Sig_/Vss.RuVkbVq2Ytp_cX61Awd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, On Fri, 05 Oct 2018 22:02:45 +1000 Michael Ellerman wr= ote: > > Ah fudge, what are the chances we add a new include of bootmem.h just as > Mike's removing bootmem. In my experience, it was almost certain ... almost every API removal conflicts with new added uses. :-) > I could just apply that to my tree. memblock.h is where early_memtest() is > actually defined anyway. However min_low_pfn and max_low_pfn are defined in bootmem.h until after it is removed. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/Vss.RuVkbVq2Ytp_cX61Awd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAlu3XQ4ACgkQAVBC80lX 0GyI1Af/b457Gsh24moiyWRAUs9XuZnTCmO7kcIrjxJ2cDnqUnfYWL5Kewvzc+Pu fs/MYPLiKZ80JOW6oVoCmmVjr1sRZbxcVHJNPmWk73KLIomsfHuYMPBU4u1secC6 kq8yXGA6AqdYkxOWOsnt36Z6V/WYb/vjr+m5h07AqfCkoNh4BxSx9DR3sX3qZDzo U7VS7sY1LZ7t7J5TklQuoRbXkPfgZT3IXuQIjIJuYKtIPPoB8LwNrg9ZIIgo/d5u nonuhc8IZjZvo8QSojKjJL9VG5VGI+g8+YXi8XIP5VeGClIDLiKNCF3shEC3LHbb zglQqbL6n/aTPDOPuuYLcNWDWy2O3w== =UriJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Vss.RuVkbVq2Ytp_cX61Awd-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296AEC00449 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 12:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C3EA20875 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 12:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="c2cd0JUT" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6C3EA20875 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42RV1T0j7KzF3S6 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 22:48:45 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="c2cd0JUT"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42RTyS6QvkzF3R0 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 22:46:08 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="c2cd0JUT"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42RTyS0BWXz9s7W; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 22:46:07 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1538743568; bh=kZ8YHf7LMkSrPJX1qYsUSDTKEmCCls6e5+J1C0ZeCvw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=c2cd0JUTS7+yGDV9+ZjiWOni/Gvh/dLtUt03p1ig3rRGw1kOjOC+4ptk9oEzZ0bRM s/hogmcGLC0eT2Hau60M/Bpk2BjvnuedXVB9GkTHUV1dTe0ZvfAQEb3CQCD4h8qJkZ 9tu3OyWdalJIUELYDe7G4D4y4FyhWe1vlXBEgk2GckVeIjR57FilPjSBtY7hF30IVW kK9iUNEEu/y3WEoZC1cgIx14MaqszrHNeEa3CHaTrcJ26sqnGxGxUviJ5C7IceE8Yq bp0DUszH/h0kOsELkl0u4ia3h1sTnhLBMzB1D6DakzpFfFjNXf0lIlrC+DfnQ9N2u/ m7/CC5QD2jXcA== Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 22:46:06 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree Message-ID: <20181005224606.2372fece@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <87d0sok3dm.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> References: <20181005161406.73ef8727@canb.auug.org.au> <87d0sok3dm.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/Vss.RuVkbVq2Ytp_cX61Awd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-Next Mailing List , Andrew Morton , PowerPC Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" --Sig_/Vss.RuVkbVq2Ytp_cX61Awd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, On Fri, 05 Oct 2018 22:02:45 +1000 Michael Ellerman wr= ote: > > Ah fudge, what are the chances we add a new include of bootmem.h just as > Mike's removing bootmem. In my experience, it was almost certain ... almost every API removal conflicts with new added uses. :-) > I could just apply that to my tree. memblock.h is where early_memtest() is > actually defined anyway. However min_low_pfn and max_low_pfn are defined in bootmem.h until after it is removed. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/Vss.RuVkbVq2Ytp_cX61Awd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAlu3XQ4ACgkQAVBC80lX 0GyI1Af/b457Gsh24moiyWRAUs9XuZnTCmO7kcIrjxJ2cDnqUnfYWL5Kewvzc+Pu fs/MYPLiKZ80JOW6oVoCmmVjr1sRZbxcVHJNPmWk73KLIomsfHuYMPBU4u1secC6 kq8yXGA6AqdYkxOWOsnt36Z6V/WYb/vjr+m5h07AqfCkoNh4BxSx9DR3sX3qZDzo U7VS7sY1LZ7t7J5TklQuoRbXkPfgZT3IXuQIjIJuYKtIPPoB8LwNrg9ZIIgo/d5u nonuhc8IZjZvo8QSojKjJL9VG5VGI+g8+YXi8XIP5VeGClIDLiKNCF3shEC3LHbb zglQqbL6n/aTPDOPuuYLcNWDWy2O3w== =UriJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Vss.RuVkbVq2Ytp_cX61Awd--