From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40766 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725866AbeJIO3R (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:29:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 09:13:44 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, rishabhb@codeaurora.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] firmware: Always initialize the fw_priv list object" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree Message-ID: <20181009071344.GB8617@kroah.com> References: <15390206251907@kroah.com> <20181008184333.GD1331@tuxbook-pro> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181008184333.GD1331@tuxbook-pro> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 11:43:33AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon 08 Oct 10:43 PDT 2018, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > id to . > > > > Hi Greg, > > If/when you pick 422b3db2a503 ("firmware: Fix security issue with > request_firmware_into_buf()") for stable you need this patch as well. > > Is there any particular way you would like me to annotate the Fixes/Cc > tags in the future to make this clear? No, the way it was marked was fine, I just wanted everyone to know that both patches failed to apply. thanks, greg k-h