[bug report] apparmor: Parse secmark policy

[Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>]

Hello Matthew Garrett,

The patch 9caafbe2b4cf: "apparmor: Parse secmark policy" from May 24,
2018, leads to the following static checker warning:

	security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c:580 unpack_secmark()
	warn: should '(struct aa_profile)->secmark' be freed with kzfree()'

security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
   558                  profile->secmark_count = size;
   559  
   560                  for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
   561                          if (!unpack_u8(e, &profile->secmark[i].audit, NULL))
   562                                  goto fail;
   563                          if (!unpack_u8(e, &profile->secmark[i].deny, NULL))
   564                                  goto fail;
   565                          if (!unpack_strdup(e, &profile->secmark[i].label, NULL))
   566                                  goto fail;
   567                  }
   568                  if (!unpack_nameX(e, AA_ARRAYEND, NULL))
   569                          goto fail;
   570                  if (!unpack_nameX(e, AA_STRUCTEND, NULL))
   571                          goto fail;
   572          }
   573  
   574          return 1;
   575  
   576  fail:
   577          if (profile->secmark) {
   578                  for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
   579                          kfree(profile->secmark[i].label);
                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   580                  kfree(profile->secmark);
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Smatch thinks that these need to be zeroed for security.  I don't know
the details though.

   581                  profile->secmark_count = 0;
   582          }
   583  
   584          e->pos = pos;
   585          return 0;
   586  }

regards,
dan carpenter