From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:33:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20181014223311.GE3260@kunai> References: <1539356258-12374-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KlAEzMkarCnErv5Q" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1539356258-12374-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson , Wolfram Sang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org --KlAEzMkarCnErv5Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > In further testing in uniphier-sd.c, > I found my stupid mistakes. I don't have the uniphier HW but I still had a look at these patches. You never know if there is something interesting for SDHI in there :) > Can you squash this series into > 3fd784f745dd > "mmc: uniphier-sd: add UniPhier SD/eMMC controller driver" > if you have a chance to do rebase? Please don't rebase! We actually develop on top of mmc/next and rebasing creates a lot of pain because we lose the base for that work. --KlAEzMkarCnErv5Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAlvDxCYACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZz3w/8C+AjQKdK8RwipxwPj7yxXCIEz1arXMXn/FhWTo4KwFI0bwESKdFGDcrr edcGkc7Eqj52t6Fs9onpc+mbOUfaMWhBIqHUJ5EJz4RMKhPVFFWgZDm+5nNCduJn bCb+Z+g91ww6APySwxDxeE/PVUDbVa6X7inSDAaJUmdnWzl4EDjHPB9pKRLqNxEM UMo8QQEyYFCvgfh5EDaQW5DYb8UpSHfcGQyCpDH9041V1E6ouQhVjuoMAzIU8Co0 qB2zV2+TcIDZXX5hHUfYoNwubWXQNJ8QPqhFzMutfZc9DItL3F92K4sht84HUZ2h n0KHVvt0mkdsQ3rLKUuCatXdQONGxiMH5rTzmdK6+U5V6nb4F9cxL+eYs0C2mdDP 7Vdiuuh64D/d4nos5BQsrVrlDeMQ3vsIXTOOtaPa5PhmHp31JdrWn9ZbiiysdTaU jaFcksIhMwWTV+EQ1bH5WEeNkUmKij40/5XFgboYrbNSobJdEqNo8P3qqhIfJrew 2nhhB03501bg0ph2Wh+rRBXLb+rWxqRRhXXJyFi0xO2qyjqtdA1UJjrofFKewbuv Z3eIWKHfJ5yfibeJ5YKWdQ1LG9WIm4Gl37w3E5J6/jyAcZklTmEaTGOBaiT1uxlw O/iLkAQQyZETT+dN5u3eC/6NW0MiXUNTO/1mZObCHC1surmEXo4= =pbql -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KlAEzMkarCnErv5Q-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:33:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes In-Reply-To: <1539356258-12374-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <1539356258-12374-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Message-ID: <20181014223311.GE3260@kunai> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > In further testing in uniphier-sd.c, > I found my stupid mistakes. I don't have the uniphier HW but I still had a look at these patches. You never know if there is something interesting for SDHI in there :) > Can you squash this series into > 3fd784f745dd > "mmc: uniphier-sd: add UniPhier SD/eMMC controller driver" > if you have a chance to do rebase? Please don't rebase! We actually develop on top of mmc/next and rebasing creates a lot of pain because we lose the base for that work. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: