From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] r8169: fix NAPI handling under high load
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 16:03:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181016160355.1cc0a2e9@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ada39488-8e9c-d6a8-461e-672642497db2@applied-asynchrony.com>
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 23:17:31 +0200
Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com> wrote:
> On 10/16/18 22:37, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > rtl_rx() and rtl_tx() are called only if the respective bits are set
> > in the interrupt status register. Under high load NAPI may not be
> > able to process all data (work_done == budget) and it will schedule
> > subsequent calls to the poll callback.
> > rtl_ack_events() however resets the bits in the interrupt status
> > register, therefore subsequent calls to rtl8169_poll() won't call
> > rtl_rx() and rtl_tx() - chip interrupts are still disabled.
>
> Very interesting! Could this be the reason for the mysterious
> hangs & resets we experienced when enabling BQL for r8169?
> They happened more often with TSO/GSO enabled and several people
> attempted to fix those hangs unsuccessfully; it was later reverted
> and has been since then (#87cda7cb43).
> If this bug has been there "forever" it might be tempting to
> re-apply BQL and see what happens. Any chance you could give that
> a try? I'll gladly test patches, just like I'll run this one.
>
> cheers
> Holger
Many drivers have buggy usage of napi_complete_done.
Might even be worth forcing all network drivers to check the return
value. But fixing 150 broken drivers will be a nuisance.
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index dc1d9ed33b31..c38bc66ffe74 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -466,7 +466,8 @@ static inline bool napi_reschedule(struct napi_struct *napi)
return false;
}
-bool napi_complete_done(struct napi_struct *n, int work_done);
+bool __must_check napi_complete_done(struct napi_struct *n, int work_done);
+
/**
* napi_complete - NAPI processing complete
* @n: NAPI context
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-17 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-16 20:37 [PATCH net] r8169: fix NAPI handling under high load Heiner Kallweit
2018-10-16 21:17 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-10-16 23:03 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2018-10-16 23:08 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-10-17 0:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-10-17 3:10 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-10-17 0:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-10-17 18:12 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-10-17 18:48 ` Fwd: " Heiner Kallweit
2018-10-17 19:11 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-10-17 19:27 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-10-17 20:07 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-10-20 9:55 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-10-17 23:30 ` Francois Romieu
2018-10-18 5:58 ` Jonathan Woithe
2018-10-18 6:03 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-10-18 6:15 ` Jonathan Woithe
2018-10-18 11:52 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-10-19 7:29 ` Jonathan Woithe
2018-10-21 23:07 ` Jonathan Woithe
2018-10-16 22:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-10-17 0:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-10-17 23:30 ` Francois Romieu
2018-10-18 5:21 ` David Miller
2018-10-18 5:58 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-10-18 6:24 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181016160355.1cc0a2e9@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.