From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BC0C04EBD for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848922147C for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="r8fGEx/q" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 848922147C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732092AbeJQBRJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2018 21:17:09 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35922 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730396AbeJQBRJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2018 21:17:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (ip-213-127-77-176.ip.prioritytelecom.net [213.127.77.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5014A204EC; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:25:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1539710742; bh=4lWIhtWpEzUXRt+xVM4G+xBS910Um42bnZ49szdbDuk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=r8fGEx/q2yA84692aUMJnLWfSpS7j41hF6xI97PYcuL77ex6E2BL/azSCs5PqK2rn 97OXghgAbZZmKBsjD9aofaIB/n476M3vrdDYtSZ4PaYn30V8ACorKu0N1K6TPz2/DY 5cFCOlm/AkIKaHEllqqsOpvkAxrNBHWjG9PLCvIM= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.9 49/71] rhashtable: add schedule points Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 19:09:46 +0200 Message-Id: <20181016170541.823906038@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20181016170539.315587743@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181016170539.315587743@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Eric Dumazet Rehashing and destroying large hash table takes a lot of time, and happens in process context. It is safe to add cond_resched() in rhashtable_rehash_table() and rhashtable_free_and_destroy() Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Acked-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: David S. Miller (cherry picked from commit ae6da1f503abb5a5081f9f6c4a6881de97830f3e) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- lib/rhashtable.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/lib/rhashtable.c +++ b/lib/rhashtable.c @@ -251,8 +251,10 @@ static int rhashtable_rehash_table(struc if (!new_tbl) return 0; - for (old_hash = 0; old_hash < old_tbl->size; old_hash++) + for (old_hash = 0; old_hash < old_tbl->size; old_hash++) { rhashtable_rehash_chain(ht, old_hash); + cond_resched(); + } /* Publish the new table pointer. */ rcu_assign_pointer(ht->tbl, new_tbl); @@ -993,6 +995,7 @@ void rhashtable_free_and_destroy(struct for (i = 0; i < tbl->size; i++) { struct rhash_head *pos, *next; + cond_resched(); for (pos = rht_dereference(tbl->buckets[i], ht), next = !rht_is_a_nulls(pos) ? rht_dereference(pos->next, ht) : NULL;