From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Liang, Ma" Subject: Re: is per patch checkpatch reports working? Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:38:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20181019103829.GA1349@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com> References: <41b40e2e-3b15-f7b3-78df-660610fe0486@intel.com> <1925609.vO2Ab2XL5m@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Qian Xu , dpdk-dev , dpdk-test-report To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1925609.vO2Ab2XL5m@xps> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Thomas, I still see the issue with the awk script inside check-symbol-changes.sh. that script still put '+' as the Section name. any suggestion ? I use fedora 24 and gawk Regards Liang On 19 Oct 11:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit: > > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me. > > Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working. > > I have just restarted it. > > For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with > the new check in checkpatches.sh. > >