All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20181021150857.4f9c2244@archlinux>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 7888675..5639911 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,70 +1,69 @@
 On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:00:02 +0800
 Song Qiang <songqiang1304521@gmail.com> wrote:
 
-> On 2018/10/12 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=888:53, Himanshu Jha wrote:
+> On 2018/10/12 下午8:53, Himanshu Jha wrote:
 > > Hi Qiang,
 > >
-> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 04:36:01PM +0800, Song Qiang wrote: =20
+> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 04:36:01PM +0800, Song Qiang wrote:  
 > >>
-> >> On 2018=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5 15:35, Song Qiang wrote: =20
+> >> On 2018年10月12日 15:35, Song Qiang wrote:  
 > >>> PNI RM3100 is a high resolution, large signal immunity magnetometer,
 > >>> composed of 3 single sensors and a processing chip with a MagI2C
 > >>> interface.
-> >>> =20
-> >> ... =20
+> >>>  
+> >> ...  
 > >>> +static irqreturn_t rm3100_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
 > >>> +{
-> >>> +	struct iio_poll_func *pf =3D p;
-> >>> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev =3D pf->indio_dev;
-> >>> +	unsigned long scan_mask =3D *indio_dev->active_scan_mask;
-> >>> +	unsigned int mask_len =3D indio_dev->masklength;
-> >>> +	struct rm3100_data *data =3D iio_priv(indio_dev);
-> >>> +	struct regmap *regmap =3D data->regmap;
+> >>> +	struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
+> >>> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
+> >>> +	unsigned long scan_mask = *indio_dev->active_scan_mask;
+> >>> +	unsigned int mask_len = indio_dev->masklength;
+> >>> +	struct rm3100_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
+> >>> +	struct regmap *regmap = data->regmap;
 > >>> +	int ret, i, bit;
 > >>> +
 > >>> +	mutex_lock(&data->lock);
 > >>> +	switch (scan_mask) {
 > >>> +	case BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2):
-> >>> +		ret =3D regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MX2, data->buffer, 9);
+> >>> +		ret = regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MX2, data->buffer, 9);
 > >>> +		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
 > >>> +		if (ret < 0)
 > >>> +			goto done;
 > >>> +	break;
 > >>> +	case BIT(0) | BIT(1):
-> >>> +		ret =3D regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MX2, data->buffer, 6);
+> >>> +		ret = regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MX2, data->buffer, 6);
 > >>> +		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
 > >>> +		if (ret < 0)
 > >>> +			goto done;
 > >>> +	break;
 > >>> +	case BIT(1) | BIT(2):
-> >>> +		ret =3D regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MY2, data->buffer, 6);
+> >>> +		ret = regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MY2, data->buffer, 6);
 > >>> +		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
 > >>> +		if (ret < 0)
 > >>> +			goto done;
-> >>> +	break; =20
+> >>> +	break;  
 > >> Hi Jonathan,
 > >>
-> >> I just noticed that these three breaks are not proper aligned. =20
+> >> I just noticed that these three breaks are not proper aligned.  
 > > Please send the new version of a patch as a *new* thread and don't
 > > use `--in-reply-to` flag(if you're using) to chain into older versions
 > > as whole thread of older discussion comes up and is often not required.
 > >
 > > The changelog gives enough info of what's new in the revised series.
 > >
-> > =20
+> >  
 > Hi Himanshu,
->=20
->=20
+> 
+> 
 > Thanks for your advise.
->=20
-> I did it because the following instruction tells me to, and I think it's=
-=20
+> 
+> I did it because the following instruction tells me to, and I think it's 
 > also a very quick way of gathering
->=20
-> all scattered messages. Both ways have their own advantages and=20
+> 
+> all scattered messages. Both ways have their own advantages and 
 > disadvantages I think. :)
->=20
-> <https://kernelnewbies.org/PatchPhilosophy> Section "Updating and=20
+> 
+> <https://kernelnewbies.org/PatchPhilosophy> Section "Updating and 
 > resending patches".
 That's a curious bit of advice.  There are certainly a lot of maintainers
 who would not want that.  It never works with anything beyond trivial
@@ -80,9 +79,9 @@ Thanks,
 
 Jonathan
 
->=20
->=20
+> 
+> 
 > yours,
->=20
+> 
 > Song Qiang
->=20
+>
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index f668e31..d9e6102 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -23,70 +23,69 @@
  "On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:00:02 +0800\n"
  "Song Qiang <songqiang1304521@gmail.com> wrote:\n"
  "\n"
- "> On 2018/10/12 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=888:53, Himanshu Jha wrote:\n"
+ "> On 2018/10/12 \344\270\213\345\215\2108:53, Himanshu Jha wrote:\n"
  "> > Hi Qiang,\n"
  "> >\n"
- "> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 04:36:01PM +0800, Song Qiang wrote: =20\n"
+ "> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 04:36:01PM +0800, Song Qiang wrote:  \n"
  "> >>\n"
- "> >> On 2018=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5 15:35, Song Qiang wrote: =20\n"
+ "> >> On 2018\345\271\26410\346\234\21012\346\227\245 15:35, Song Qiang wrote:  \n"
  "> >>> PNI RM3100 is a high resolution, large signal immunity magnetometer,\n"
  "> >>> composed of 3 single sensors and a processing chip with a MagI2C\n"
  "> >>> interface.\n"
- "> >>> =20\n"
- "> >> ... =20\n"
+ "> >>>  \n"
+ "> >> ...  \n"
  "> >>> +static irqreturn_t rm3100_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)\n"
  "> >>> +{\n"
- "> >>> +\tstruct iio_poll_func *pf =3D p;\n"
- "> >>> +\tstruct iio_dev *indio_dev =3D pf->indio_dev;\n"
- "> >>> +\tunsigned long scan_mask =3D *indio_dev->active_scan_mask;\n"
- "> >>> +\tunsigned int mask_len =3D indio_dev->masklength;\n"
- "> >>> +\tstruct rm3100_data *data =3D iio_priv(indio_dev);\n"
- "> >>> +\tstruct regmap *regmap =3D data->regmap;\n"
+ "> >>> +\tstruct iio_poll_func *pf = p;\n"
+ "> >>> +\tstruct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;\n"
+ "> >>> +\tunsigned long scan_mask = *indio_dev->active_scan_mask;\n"
+ "> >>> +\tunsigned int mask_len = indio_dev->masklength;\n"
+ "> >>> +\tstruct rm3100_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);\n"
+ "> >>> +\tstruct regmap *regmap = data->regmap;\n"
  "> >>> +\tint ret, i, bit;\n"
  "> >>> +\n"
  "> >>> +\tmutex_lock(&data->lock);\n"
  "> >>> +\tswitch (scan_mask) {\n"
  "> >>> +\tcase BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2):\n"
- "> >>> +\t\tret =3D regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MX2, data->buffer, 9);\n"
+ "> >>> +\t\tret = regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MX2, data->buffer, 9);\n"
  "> >>> +\t\tmutex_unlock(&data->lock);\n"
  "> >>> +\t\tif (ret < 0)\n"
  "> >>> +\t\t\tgoto done;\n"
  "> >>> +\tbreak;\n"
  "> >>> +\tcase BIT(0) | BIT(1):\n"
- "> >>> +\t\tret =3D regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MX2, data->buffer, 6);\n"
+ "> >>> +\t\tret = regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MX2, data->buffer, 6);\n"
  "> >>> +\t\tmutex_unlock(&data->lock);\n"
  "> >>> +\t\tif (ret < 0)\n"
  "> >>> +\t\t\tgoto done;\n"
  "> >>> +\tbreak;\n"
  "> >>> +\tcase BIT(1) | BIT(2):\n"
- "> >>> +\t\tret =3D regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MY2, data->buffer, 6);\n"
+ "> >>> +\t\tret = regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MY2, data->buffer, 6);\n"
  "> >>> +\t\tmutex_unlock(&data->lock);\n"
  "> >>> +\t\tif (ret < 0)\n"
  "> >>> +\t\t\tgoto done;\n"
- "> >>> +\tbreak; =20\n"
+ "> >>> +\tbreak;  \n"
  "> >> Hi Jonathan,\n"
  "> >>\n"
- "> >> I just noticed that these three breaks are not proper aligned. =20\n"
+ "> >> I just noticed that these three breaks are not proper aligned.  \n"
  "> > Please send the new version of a patch as a *new* thread and don't\n"
  "> > use `--in-reply-to` flag(if you're using) to chain into older versions\n"
  "> > as whole thread of older discussion comes up and is often not required.\n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > The changelog gives enough info of what's new in the revised series.\n"
  "> >\n"
- "> > =20\n"
+ "> >  \n"
  "> Hi Himanshu,\n"
- ">=20\n"
- ">=20\n"
+ "> \n"
+ "> \n"
  "> Thanks for your advise.\n"
- ">=20\n"
- "> I did it because the following instruction tells me to, and I think it's=\n"
- "=20\n"
+ "> \n"
+ "> I did it because the following instruction tells me to, and I think it's \n"
  "> also a very quick way of gathering\n"
- ">=20\n"
- "> all scattered messages. Both ways have their own advantages and=20\n"
+ "> \n"
+ "> all scattered messages. Both ways have their own advantages and \n"
  "> disadvantages I think. :)\n"
- ">=20\n"
- "> <https://kernelnewbies.org/PatchPhilosophy> Section \"Updating and=20\n"
+ "> \n"
+ "> <https://kernelnewbies.org/PatchPhilosophy> Section \"Updating and \n"
  "> resending patches\".\n"
  "That's a curious bit of advice.  There are certainly a lot of maintainers\n"
  "who would not want that.  It never works with anything beyond trivial\n"
@@ -102,11 +101,11 @@
  "\n"
  "Jonathan\n"
  "\n"
- ">=20\n"
- ">=20\n"
+ "> \n"
+ "> \n"
  "> yours,\n"
- ">=20\n"
+ "> \n"
  "> Song Qiang\n"
- >=20
+ >
 
-a344b9d789f47aa4a0102026b2a00c5c9421dcdbabdd56abfde3afd6d22a1779
+f3383e8d8391ec61d42785759921163440bc976c853be7e75fce62c70a3dafbe

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.