All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	tom.leiming@gmail.com, hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] block: fix the DISCARD request merge
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:06:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181022090601.GA21171@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1540045777-10290-1-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>

On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:29:37PM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> There are two cases when handle DISCARD merge
>  - max_discard_segments == 1
>    bios need to be contiguous
>  - max_discard_segments > 1
>    Only nvme right now. It takes every bio as a range and different
>    range needn't to be contiguous.
> 
> But now, attempt_merge screws this up. It always consider contiguity
> for DISCARD for the case max_discard_segments > 1 and cannot merge
> contiguous DISCARD for the case max_discard_segments == 1, because
> rq_attempt_discard_merge always returns false in this case.
> This patch fixes both of the two cases above.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
> ---
> 
> V2:
>   - Add max_discard_segments > 1 checking in attempt_merge
>   - Change patch title and comment
>   - Add more comment in attempt_merge
> 
>  block/blk-merge.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 42a4674..8f22374 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -734,8 +734,15 @@ static struct request *attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q,
>  	/*
>  	 * not contiguous
>  	 */
> -	if (blk_rq_pos(req) + blk_rq_sectors(req) != blk_rq_pos(next))
> -		return NULL;
> +	if (blk_rq_pos(req) + blk_rq_sectors(req) != blk_rq_pos(next)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * When max_discard_segments is bigger than 1 (only nvme right
> +		 * now), needn't consider the contiguity.
> +		 */
> +		if (!(req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD &&
> +		      queue_max_discard_segments(q) > 1))
> +			return NULL;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (rq_data_dir(req) != rq_data_dir(next)
>  	    || req->rq_disk != next->rq_disk
> @@ -757,10 +764,17 @@ static struct request *attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q,
>  	 * If we are allowed to merge, then append bio list
>  	 * from next to rq and release next. merge_requests_fn
>  	 * will have updated segment counts, update sector
> -	 * counts here. Handle DISCARDs separately, as they
> -	 * have separate settings.
> +	 * counts here.
> +	 * Two cases of Handling DISCARD:
> +	 *  - max_discard_segments == 1
> +	 *    The bios need to be contiguous.
> +	 *  - max_discard_segments > 1
> +	 *    Only nvme right now. It takes every bio as a
> +	 *    range and send them to controller together. The ranges
> +	 *    needn't to be contiguous.
>  	 */
> -	if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) {
> +	if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD &&
> +	    queue_max_discard_segments(q) > 1) {
>  		if (!req_attempt_discard_merge(q, req, next))
>  			return NULL;

Looks fine,

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

The above may be changed to 'if (blk_try_merge(req) == ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE)'
or sort of in future, which may has document benefit at least, since
ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE means multi-segment discard merge.


Thanks,
Ming

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-22  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-20 14:29 [PATCH V2] block: fix the DISCARD request merge Jianchao Wang
2018-10-22  9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-22 10:13   ` jianchao.wang
2018-10-22  9:06 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-10-22  9:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-22 10:14     ` jianchao.wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181022090601.GA21171@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.