From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Make number of ddi ports explicit.
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 18:30:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181022153019.GL9144@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181019201945.9792-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 01:19:43PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Instead of a simple bool that shows if we have ddi ports
> or not, let's highlight the number of ddi ports.
>
> So we can use this information to determine the code
> path instead of using platforms codenames.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 3017ef037fed..7ad232849268 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2647,7 +2647,7 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> #define HAS_DP_MST(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.has_dp_mst)
>
> -#define HAS_DDI(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.has_ddi)
> +#define HAS_DDI(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.ddi_ports > 0)
> #define HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.has_fpga_dbg)
> #define HAS_PSR(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.has_psr)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index 0a05cc7ace14..0427486f63d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info intel_valleyview_info = {
> #define G75_FEATURES \
> GEN7_FEATURES, \
> .ring_mask = RENDER_RING | BSD_RING | BLT_RING | VEBOX_RING, \
> - .has_ddi = 1, \
> + .ddi_ports = 5, \
> .has_fpga_dbg = 1, \
> .has_psr = 1, \
> .has_dp_mst = 1, \
> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info intel_skylake_gt4_info = {
> .ring_mask = RENDER_RING | BSD_RING | BLT_RING | VEBOX_RING, \
> .num_pipes = 3, \
> .has_64bit_reloc = 1, \
> - .has_ddi = 1, \
> + .ddi_ports = 3, \
> .has_fpga_dbg = 1, \
> .has_fbc = 1, \
> .has_psr = 1, \
> @@ -596,6 +596,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info intel_cannonlake_info = {
> #define GEN11_FEATURES \
> GEN10_FEATURES, \
> GEN(11), \
> + .ddi_ports = 6, \
> .ddb_size = 2048, \
> .has_logical_ring_elsq = 1
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> index af7002640cdf..1be941222ed0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> @@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ enum intel_ppgtt {
> /* Keep has_* in alphabetical order */ \
> func(has_64bit_reloc); \
> func(has_csr); \
> - func(has_ddi); \
> func(has_dp_mst); \
> func(has_reset_engine); \
> func(has_fbc); \
> @@ -165,6 +164,7 @@ struct intel_device_info {
>
> u32 display_mmio_offset;
>
> + u8 ddi_ports;
num_ddi_ports?
Or might we even want a bitmask?
> u8 num_pipes;
> u8 num_sprites[I915_MAX_PIPES];
> u8 num_scalers[I915_MAX_PIPES];
> --
> 2.19.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-22 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-19 20:19 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Make number of ddi ports explicit Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-19 20:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Prefer direct IS_CANNONLAKE over IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-19 20:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use the ddi_ports info to kill ugly CNL_WITH_PORT_F Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-19 22:38 ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-22 15:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Make number of ddi ports explicit. (rev2) Patchwork
2018-10-22 15:06 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-10-22 15:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-10-22 15:30 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-26 23:15 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Make number of ddi ports explicit Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181022153019.GL9144@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.