From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/ICL: Add pre_pll_enable hook for ICL and set DFLEXDPMLE in this hook
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:15:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181022191515.GD17333@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c73352fc0f1235693e840e7f6696da0edba802e.camel@intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 05:52:14PM -0700, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-10-18 at 15:16 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > In case of Legacy DP connector on TypeC port, the
> > flex IO DPMLE register is set to number of lanes configured
> > by the display driver which will be programmed into DDI_BUF_CTL
> > PORT_WIDTH_SELECTION.
> > This needs to be programmed before enabling the shared PLLs hence
> > add a pre_pll_enable hook for ICL and add this programming in that
> > hook.
> >
> > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 52
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > index 6b9742baa5f2..fd84f88753cb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -3311,6 +3311,56 @@ static void bxt_ddi_pre_pll_enable(struct
> > intel_encoder *encoder,
> > bxt_ddi_phy_set_lane_optim_mask(encoder, mask);
> > }
> >
> > +static void intel_ddi_set_fia_lane_count(struct intel_encoder
> > *encoder,
> > + const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *pipe_config,
> > + enum port port)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> > + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(&encoder-
> > >base);
> > + enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, port);
> > + u32 val = I915_READ(PORT_TX_DFLEXDPMLE1);
> > + bool lane_reversal = (dig_port->tc_type == TC_PORT_TYPEC) ?
> > false :
> > + dig_port->saved_port_bits & DDI_BUF_PORT_REVERSAL;
>
> I guess this is more easy to read:
> bool lane_reversal = dig_port->tc_type == TC_PORT_TYPEC && dig_port-
> >saved_port_bits & DDI_BUF_PORT_REVERSAL;
Actually this will not work for TC_PORT_LEGACY since the first condition dig_port->tc_type == TC_PORT_TYPEC will
be false and it will set lane_reversal to false irrespective of DDI_BUF_PORT_REVERSAL because of the &&
>
> > +
> > + val &= ~DFLEXDPMLE1_DPMLETC_MASK(tc_port);
> > + switch (pipe_config->lane_count) {
> > + case 1:
> > + val |= (lane_reversal) ?
> > DFLEXDPMLE1_DPMLETC_ML3(tc_port) :
> > + DFLEXDPMLE1_DPMLETC_ML0(tc_port);
>
> For me the DFLEXDPMLE1_DPMLETC_ML0(tc_port); should be align with '('
> but if bot said that it is okay...
Ok will check the alignment one more time.
>
> > + break;
> > + case 2:
> > + val |= (lane_reversal) ?
> > DFLEXDPMLE1_DPMLETC_ML3_2(tc_port) :
> > + DFLEXDPMLE1_DPMLETC_ML1_0(tc_port);
> > + break;
> > + case 4:
> > + val |= DFLEXDPMLE1_DPMLETC_ML_3_0(tc_port);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + MISSING_CASE(pipe_config->lane_count);
> > + }
> > + I915_WRITE(PORT_TX_DFLEXDPMLE1, val);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void icl_ddi_pre_pll_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > + const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *pipe_config,
> > + const struct drm_connector_state
> > *conn_state)
> > +{
> > + enum port port = encoder->port;
> > + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(&encoder-
> > >base);
> > +
> > + if (intel_port_is_combophy(to_i915(encoder->base.dev), port))
> > + return;
>
> Combophy ports will have dig_port->tc_type == TC_PORT_UNKNOWN so you
> can drop this.
Ok will do.
Manasi
>
> With this change:
> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
>
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Program the lane count for static/dynamic connections on
> > Type-C ports.
> > + * Skip this step for TBT.
> > + */
> > + if (dig_port->tc_type == TC_PORT_TBT)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + intel_ddi_set_fia_lane_count(encoder, pipe_config, port);
> > +}
> > +
> > void intel_ddi_prepare_link_retrain(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > {
> > struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port =
> > dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > @@ -3828,6 +3878,8 @@ void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv, enum port port)
> > intel_encoder->enable = intel_enable_ddi;
> > if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> > intel_encoder->pre_pll_enable = bxt_ddi_pre_pll_enable;
> > + if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv))
> > + intel_encoder->pre_pll_enable = icl_ddi_pre_pll_enable;
> > intel_encoder->pre_enable = intel_ddi_pre_enable;
> > intel_encoder->disable = intel_disable_ddi;
> > intel_encoder->post_disable = intel_ddi_post_disable;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-22 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-18 22:16 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/icl: Fix the macros for DFLEXDPMLE register bits Manasi Navare
2018-10-18 22:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/ICL: Add pre_pll_enable hook for ICL and set DFLEXDPMLE in this hook Manasi Navare
2018-10-20 0:52 ` Souza, Jose
2018-10-22 19:15 ` Manasi Navare [this message]
2018-10-18 22:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/icl: Fix the macros for DFLEXDPMLE register bits Patchwork
2018-10-19 21:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Srivatsa, Anusha
2018-10-22 19:05 ` Manasi Navare
2018-10-20 0:48 ` Souza, Jose
2018-10-22 14:59 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/icl: Fix the macros for DFLEXDPMLE register bits (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181022191515.GD17333@intel.com \
--to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.