From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>,
Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:04:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181031130442.GB9007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5j+MYbAiSxdhLnQHdOZC-B=FWZoODxzwkYVEUqDc9SHnBQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/30, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> I'd like to avoid changing the return value of __secure_computing() to
> just avoid having to touch all the callers. And I'd prefer not to
> change __seccomp_filter() to a bool, since I'd like the return values
> to be consistent through the call chain.
Sure, please forget.
> I find the existing code more readable than a single-line return, just
> because it's very explicit. I don't want to have to think any harder
> when reading seccomp. ;)
Heh ;) Again, please forget, this is cosmetic.
But I simply can't resist. I asked this question exactly because I was
confused by these 2 lines:
if (__seccomp_filter(this_syscall, NULL, true))
return -1;
return 0;
to me it looks as if we need to filter out some non-zero return values and
turn them into -1. I had to spend some time (and think harder ;) to verify
that this is just the recursive call and nothing more.
nevermind, please ignore.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-31 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-29 22:40 [PATCH v8 0/2] seccomp trap to userspace Tycho Andersen
2018-10-29 22:40 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] seccomp: add a return code to " Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 14:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 15:32 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-01 14:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-01 20:33 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-02 11:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-02 13:50 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 15:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 15:54 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 15:54 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 16:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 16:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 17:21 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 21:32 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-31 13:04 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2018-10-30 21:38 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-30 21:49 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-30 21:54 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 22:00 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-30 22:32 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 22:34 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-31 0:29 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-31 1:29 ` Kees Cook
2018-11-01 13:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-01 19:56 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-02 10:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-02 13:38 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-01 13:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-01 19:58 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-29 23:08 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-30 10:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-29 22:40 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] samples: add an example of seccomp user trap Tycho Andersen
2018-10-29 23:31 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-10-30 2:05 ` Tycho Andersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181031130442.GB9007@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=asarai@suse.de \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
--cc=tyhicks@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.