From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5555207697045903306=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] new gemalto plugin
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 19:03:22 +0100
Message-ID: <20181031180322.GA29388@amd>
In-Reply-To: <CAKSBH7FiSURgggfqPnBK-LEOPzZc8D6Et-RKHvt7Orimn5Tvqw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <ofono.ofono.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org

--===============5555207697045903306==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi!

> > Also, there are security and interference aspects to consider.  One can
> > send some AT command that interferes with the functioning of an atom
> > driver for example and then your entire system breaks.  Trust me, it is
> > just not a good idea.  If you want to shoot yourself in the foot, be my
> > guest.  But it isn't going upstream ;)
> =

> it's ok, GPLv2 just requires me to publish the changes I have done to
> the code, not to fight to get them upstream.

Actually, GPLv2 does not you require to publish your changes.

It just (approximately) means that if you give binaries to someone, you giv=
e them
sources, too...

Best regards,
									Pavel

-- =

(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo=
g.html

--===============5555207697045903306==
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcgdjEKCmlFWUVBUkVD
QUFZRkFsdlo3bW9BQ2drUU1PZndhcFhiK3ZKRDJ3Q2d3eDlyYjdBNEVwQ2gybi9QRjU5TDZ6bnYK
ZlNvQW4wNzRGdGxVdHV5MElKNDdtT2w3M3VlMi9DU1gKPWFvUEkKLS0tLS1FTkQgUEdQIFNJR05B
VFVSRS0tLS0tCg==

--===============5555207697045903306==--