From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it1-f171.google.com (mail-it1-f171.google.com [209.85.166.171]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA05279E27 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 14:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it1-f171.google.com with SMTP id r5-v6so2212311ith.2 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 07:04:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=/y9ZKvInxG6T7BaY0HwwEBd4Q7wtHXRpDNCEXmZYNo8=; b=IPE/4QH6BsuXgOSoQN1lXXZ12uhNJxA9r68JpqaLl0YDAEbJzazQvpUbZQ9AtEHkkb 2xZSQL4TJTksfyoWfFXyt2tMpEox0VSdncGTpHAX9wJkd16YYBna9BOeVb/uVMDrBwwV Gs8QSsauwGAzwkCiPFDz1yCO6bFXf8gNCqByuyI7sENhr5AnVEmiKYomu5FN61EIm9eS AfKZSMgN9225EhlWyZTuJGjb/oFyCclBsm5DMvFzaI0TnQgrvak6zM/BBznLSm4U36OH rg3IaOWRV/L2jgl0vg3IsPmOYzb0FzbDnRIhY5NTyH0XX5RKS+J4a34/njMJCwP0jtoq thwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=/y9ZKvInxG6T7BaY0HwwEBd4Q7wtHXRpDNCEXmZYNo8=; b=IQl0+KruKxN6Q4xiMuwpgKU4Se1aw+9qhyxQd3hkXDIOuccC1I/NyD2Gi6ChhM5d26 w1iFPO/HKOhxx3HUJahHF12cgcf46Xqa8piwB6xnjJ23bWilIQOplc/NH+qrNSIMxPHo JIwCxfyLcIjA9eeJO/BvnrGH8t1pBhVjwCqhumTtZUoCILSr20DMM+j7ny9OzwCYIDWE 3cZXwQpbNIklOPAtQ8i2wCD1897c+RuXS4AdBF1IG7JMWEV0Av+VkQjJK8CVdG9B9yUD w4qWWxRmfuNMX3mRBFp/YijOGzyWKesmqT/AGmeYjox9y7rKm/La5xxEWliyzogfE/YR 7fuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKRY4LwqnZRmOM5YoXKp3ZconLB28LSI4Ij6cWpEjgpPrF0/S/t nGzSZmcfK+F8UU96XPRTo+KyPYHo X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5c+uBcxqJiLpxjZEbpZAQeVJBVkpUhlWWUCNYRPNaHjqS0Rg37MP0Ctr9+NLUhoybSu9GSN9w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:660c:284:: with SMTP id s4mr5348361itl.162.1541081062029; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 07:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux-uys3 ([206.248.190.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q15-v6sm6998407itc.38.2018.11.01.07.04.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Nov 2018 07:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:04:17 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner To: yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, yocto-advocacy@yoctoproject.org Message-ID: <20181101140417.GA12376@linux-uys3> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Subject: OEDAM @ SCaLE 2019 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 14:04:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Hello Fellow YP/OE Enthusiasts! There were discussions at our recent OEDEM regarding: - our next developers meeting - SCaLE 2019 - expanding/adding to the YP/OE presence at conferences (i.e. our own miniconf?) Please see time indices: 12:13 and 16:45 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YDAHjIOXCIgvSZVOKCYLxa8h26dkruX8zspoge7zCpk Unfortunately, although lots of opinions were expressed, nothing concrete was decided. Many people pointed out that their travel budgets are already strained or maxed out, so adding another conference would be difficult if not impossible. It's unclear how many "core" YP/OE people might show up at next year's SCaLE. Also, given that this year's ELC scheduling hiccup is a one-off, maybe it doesn't make as much sense to put in all the work required to run an OEDAM at SCaLE if it's only ever going to happen once. Therefore I think I can safely say the organizing committee for YP/OE Things at SCaLE 2019 is leaning towards not running an OEDAM. It's not too late to change our plans. If a large number of core people reply to this email saying they want and OEDAM in March and will be available in Pasadena, then we could accommodate it. It's just that we didn't leave Edinburgh with the feeling that an OEDAM at SCaLE was feasible. Also, at this point SCaLE isn't on the radars of many of the core YP/OE people, and currently the conference tends to attract users rather than developers (or so is my impression). Thoughts? Best regards, Trevor