From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86381C32789 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 18:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5747620847 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 18:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YdGCpChE" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5747620847 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729937AbeKCDvh (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2018 23:51:37 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46808 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728961AbeKCDvg (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2018 23:51:36 -0400 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F24CF20847; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 18:43:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1541184203; bh=SCWD+HAQxy1i03z8Sgw91ivvLmuJLUSarS938PYECUc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YdGCpChEWWL8sdtYEjvYkR9kbtRiSS8z0cg9xH5g2aaJPzifaO2H2CP36ESVuBou+ FnZXID7U8LjIwPZ06nFdgRvV1ThMfJ2+awknKTOy7tAG5WQSEuvUzunfr6quKIkvwE p6xwPH9UnlgQ+2tUk9SZN40jkh0fs5Q4Y5A+l4dg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Sabrina Dubroca , Stefano Brivio , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.18 106/150] ipv6: rate-limit probes for neighbourless routes Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 19:34:28 +0100 Message-Id: <20181102182910.664214711@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20181102182902.250560510@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181102182902.250560510@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Sabrina Dubroca [ Upstream commit f547fac624be53ad8b07e9ebca7654a7827ba61b ] When commit 270972554c91 ("[IPV6]: ROUTE: Add Router Reachability Probing (RFC4191).") introduced router probing, the rt6_probe() function required that a neighbour entry existed. This neighbour entry is used to record the timestamp of the last probe via the ->updated field. Later, commit 2152caea7196 ("ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe().") removed the requirement for a neighbour entry. Neighbourless routes skip the interval check and are not rate-limited. This patch adds rate-limiting for neighbourless routes, by recording the timestamp of the last probe in the fib6_info itself. Fixes: 2152caea7196 ("ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe().") Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/net/ip6_fib.h | 4 ++++ net/ipv6/route.c | 12 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/include/net/ip6_fib.h +++ b/include/net/ip6_fib.h @@ -159,6 +159,10 @@ struct fib6_info { struct rt6_info * __percpu *rt6i_pcpu; struct rt6_exception_bucket __rcu *rt6i_exception_bucket; +#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF + unsigned long last_probe; +#endif + u32 fib6_metric; u8 fib6_protocol; u8 fib6_type; --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -517,10 +517,11 @@ static void rt6_probe_deferred(struct wo static void rt6_probe(struct fib6_info *rt) { - struct __rt6_probe_work *work; + struct __rt6_probe_work *work = NULL; const struct in6_addr *nh_gw; struct neighbour *neigh; struct net_device *dev; + struct inet6_dev *idev; /* * Okay, this does not seem to be appropriate @@ -536,15 +537,12 @@ static void rt6_probe(struct fib6_info * nh_gw = &rt->fib6_nh.nh_gw; dev = rt->fib6_nh.nh_dev; rcu_read_lock_bh(); + idev = __in6_dev_get(dev); neigh = __ipv6_neigh_lookup_noref(dev, nh_gw); if (neigh) { - struct inet6_dev *idev; - if (neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID) goto out; - idev = __in6_dev_get(dev); - work = NULL; write_lock(&neigh->lock); if (!(neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID) && time_after(jiffies, @@ -554,11 +552,13 @@ static void rt6_probe(struct fib6_info * __neigh_set_probe_once(neigh); } write_unlock(&neigh->lock); - } else { + } else if (time_after(jiffies, rt->last_probe + + idev->cnf.rtr_probe_interval)) { work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC); } if (work) { + rt->last_probe = jiffies; INIT_WORK(&work->work, rt6_probe_deferred); work->target = *nh_gw; dev_hold(dev);