From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] of/property: Introduce of_fwnode_name() Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:58:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20181106105803.GS10650@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20181105091727.25544-1-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <20181105091727.25544-4-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Heikki Krogerus , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mika Westerberg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:50:02PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:17 AM Heikki Krogerus > wrote: > > +static const char *of_fwnode_name(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) > > +{ > > + return to_of_node(fwnode)->name; > > I'm trying to get rid of the DT name ptr, so please don't add one. You > can use of_node_full_name() here instead if "@" > instead of is fine. Otherwise, you've got to allocate your own > storage and use "%pOFn" printf specifier. If we do this here, we will change a behaviour of the entire set of of_fwnode_get_named_child_node() users. I think this is out of scope of the series. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko