From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: [RFC PATCH] nvme of: don't flush scan work inside reset context
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:51:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181107035107.GA6920@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97aae455-fa74-b1aa-21f6-80c03732a573@grimberg.me>
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018@07:26:28PM -0800, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Ming,
>
> > When scan work is in-progress, any controller error may trigger
> > reset, now fc, rdma and loop host tries to flush scan work
> > inside reset context.
> >
> > This way can cause deadlock easily because any IO during controler
> > recovery(reset) can't be completed until the recovery is done.
>
> Did you encounter this deadlock? or is it theoretical?
There are several such reports in Red Hat Bugzilla.
>
> The point of nvme_stop_ctrl is to quiesce everything before
> moving forward with tearing down the controller instead of
> trying to handle concurrent incoming I/O.
>
> I'm not sure I understand why you say that I/O can only be
> completed when the reset is done? if the transport entered
Please see nvme_rdma_teardown_io_queues(), in which each in-flight
request is canceled via nvme_cancel_request(), which just calls
nvme_complete_rq() to requeue request(normal IO) to blk-mq sw queue
or scheduler queue.
During reset, block request queues are quiesced, so the requeued
requests can't be dispatched to nvme driver until reset is done.
That is why all normal I/O can only be completed after reset is done.
> a failed state either the inflight I/O is drain or one of
> the scan work I/O operations times out.
Timeout only works for in-flight request, as mentioned above,
all these requests are canceled and put back into blk-mq sw queue
or scheduler queue during reset, so timeout handler can't cover
them at all.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-07 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-05 11:57 [RFC PATCH] nvme of: don't flush scan work inside reset context Ming Lei
2018-11-05 16:28 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-06 0:30 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-05 20:04 ` James Smart
2018-11-06 1:18 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-06 5:45 ` James Smart
2018-11-07 1:58 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-08 0:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-08 17:49 ` James Smart
2018-11-07 3:26 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-07 3:51 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-11-07 4:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-07 8:34 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-07 18:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-07 19:27 ` James Smart
2018-11-08 0:05 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181107035107.GA6920@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.