From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Pass the new crtc_state to ->disable_plane()
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 14:08:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181107220843.GM2237@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181101150605.18235-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 05:06:01PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> We're going to need access to the new crtc state in ->disable_plane()
> for SKL+ wm/ddb programming and pre-skl pipe gamma/csc control. Pass
> the crtc state down.
>
> We'll also try to make intel_crtc_disable_planes() drtr as much as
> it's possible. The fact that we don't have a separate crtc state
> for the disabled state when we're going to re-enable the crtc later
> means we might end up poking at a few extra planes in there. But
> that's harmless. I suppose one migth argue that we wouldn't have to
> care about proper ddb/wm/csc/gamma if the pipe is going to permanently
> disable anyway, but the state checker probably cares so we should try
> our best to make sure everything is programmed correctly even in that
> case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 39 ++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h | 8 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 12 ++++---
> 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> index 010269a12390..69fc7010190c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ void intel_update_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *old_state,
> } else {
> trace_intel_disable_plane(&plane->base, crtc);
>
> - plane->disable_plane(plane, crtc);
> + plane->disable_plane(plane, new_crtc_state);
> }
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 33d73915b73e..6088ae554e56 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -2781,7 +2781,7 @@ static void intel_plane_disable_noatomic(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> intel_pre_disable_primary_noatomic(&crtc->base);
>
> trace_intel_disable_plane(&plane->base, crtc);
> - plane->disable_plane(plane, crtc);
> + plane->disable_plane(plane, crtc_state);
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -3386,7 +3386,7 @@ static void i9xx_update_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void i9xx_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> enum i9xx_plane_id i9xx_plane = plane->i9xx_plane;
> @@ -5421,23 +5421,32 @@ static void intel_pre_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> intel_update_watermarks(crtc);
> }
>
> -static void intel_crtc_disable_planes(struct intel_crtc *crtc, unsigned plane_mask)
> +static void intel_crtc_disable_planes(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> - struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> + intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> + unsigned int update_mask = new_crtc_state->update_planes;
> + const struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state;
> struct intel_plane *plane;
> unsigned fb_bits = 0;
> + int i;
>
> intel_crtc_dpms_overlay_disable(crtc);
>
> - for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, crtc, plane) {
> - if (plane_mask & BIT(plane->id)) {
> - plane->disable_plane(plane, crtc);
> + for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state(state, plane, old_plane_state, i) {
why getting "i" if it is unused later?
do you have plans to reuse this for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state somewhere else?
Besides the "i" I'm not sure I liked it returning multiple things.
if we are not going to use in more places I'd prefer something more verbose
here than macromagics.
> + if (crtc->pipe != plane->pipe ||
> + !(update_mask & BIT(plane->id)))
> + continue;
> +
> + plane->disable_plane(plane, new_crtc_state);
>
> + if (old_plane_state->base.visible)
> fb_bits |= plane->frontbuffer_bit;
> - }
> }
>
> - intel_frontbuffer_flip(to_i915(dev), fb_bits);
> + intel_frontbuffer_flip(dev_priv, fb_bits);
> }
>
> static void intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> @@ -9855,9 +9864,9 @@ static void i845_update_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void i845_disable_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> - i845_update_cursor(plane, NULL, NULL);
> + i845_update_cursor(plane, crtc_state, NULL);
> }
>
> static bool i845_cursor_get_hw_state(struct intel_plane *plane,
> @@ -10084,9 +10093,9 @@ static void i9xx_update_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void i9xx_disable_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> - i9xx_update_cursor(plane, NULL, NULL);
> + i9xx_update_cursor(plane, crtc_state, NULL);
> }
>
> static bool i9xx_cursor_get_hw_state(struct intel_plane *plane,
> @@ -12840,7 +12849,7 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> intel_pre_plane_update(old_intel_crtc_state, new_intel_crtc_state);
>
> if (old_crtc_state->active) {
> - intel_crtc_disable_planes(intel_crtc, old_intel_crtc_state->active_planes);
> + intel_crtc_disable_planes(intel_state, intel_crtc);
>
> /*
> * We need to disable pipe CRC before disabling the pipe,
> @@ -13695,7 +13704,7 @@ intel_legacy_cursor_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> to_intel_plane_state(plane->state));
> } else {
> trace_intel_disable_plane(plane, to_intel_crtc(crtc));
> - intel_plane->disable_plane(intel_plane, to_intel_crtc(crtc));
> + intel_plane->disable_plane(intel_plane, crtc_state);
> }
>
> intel_plane_unpin_fb(to_intel_plane_state(old_plane_state));
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> index 5d50decbcbb5..df9e6ebb27de 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> @@ -382,6 +382,14 @@ struct intel_link_m_n {
> for_each_power_well_rev(__dev_priv, __power_well) \
> for_each_if((__power_well)->desc->domains & (__domain_mask))
>
> +#define for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state(__state, plane, old_plane_state, __i) \
> + for ((__i) = 0; \
> + (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_total_plane && \
> + ((plane) = to_intel_plane((__state)->base.planes[__i].ptr), \
> + (old_plane_state) = to_intel_plane_state((__state)->base.planes[__i].old_state), 1); \
> + (__i)++) \
> + for_each_if(plane)
> +
> #define for_each_new_intel_plane_in_state(__state, plane, new_plane_state, __i) \
> for ((__i) = 0; \
> (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_total_plane && \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 7a55f5921d34..facd5cb0b540 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ struct intel_plane {
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
> void (*disable_plane)(struct intel_plane *plane,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> bool (*get_hw_state)(struct intel_plane *plane, enum pipe *pipe);
> int (*check_plane)(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> index 84c5f532fba5..2f97a298c24e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> @@ -488,7 +488,8 @@ icl_update_slave(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void
> -skl_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +skl_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> enum plane_id plane_id = plane->id;
> @@ -751,7 +752,8 @@ vlv_update_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void
> -vlv_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +vlv_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe;
> @@ -918,7 +920,8 @@ ivb_update_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void
> -ivb_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +ivb_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe;
> @@ -1084,7 +1087,8 @@ g4x_update_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void
> -g4x_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +g4x_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe;
> --
> 2.18.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-07 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-01 15:05 [PATCH 00/14] drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: Nuke posting reads from plane update/disable funcs Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 18:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: Clean up skl_program_scaler() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 18:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-07 18:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-09 17:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Remove the PS_PWR_GATE write from skl_program_scaler() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:53 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: Polish the skl+ plane keyval/msk/max register setup Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:41 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 19:55 ` [PATCH " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-07 20:56 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Clean up skl+ PLANE_POS vs. scaler handling Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 19:56 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: Reorganize plane register writes to make them more atomic Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-08 19:30 ` Matt Roper
2018-11-08 19:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-07 21:26 ` [PATCH " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-07 21:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: Move single buffered plane register writes to the end Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 21:26 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 22:06 ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 13:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: Generalize skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 21:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: Introduce crtc_state->update_planes bitmask Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 21:49 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 11:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-08 23:22 ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 13:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Pass the new crtc_state to ->disable_plane() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 22:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2018-11-08 11:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-08 23:52 ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 14:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Fix latency==0 handling for level 0 watermark on skl+ Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 22:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-09 0:01 ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 14:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Remove some useless zeroing on skl+ wm calculations Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 22:11 ` [PATCH " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 11:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: Move ddb/wm programming into plane update/disable hooks on skl+ Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-09 1:38 ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 14:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: Commit skl+ planes in an order that avoids ddb overlaps Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 15:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully Patchwork
2018-11-01 16:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev2) Patchwork
2018-11-01 16:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-11-01 16:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-11-01 18:13 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-11-07 19:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev6) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181107220843.GM2237@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.