Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit IOVA address width.

[Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 07:49:46PM +0800, Yu Zhang wrote:
> A 5-level paging capable VM may choose to use 57-bit IOVA address width.
> E.g. guest applications like DPDK prefer to use its VA as IOVA when
> performing VFIO map/unmap operations, to avoid the burden of managing the
> IOVA space.

Since you mentioned about DPDK... I'm just curious that whether have
you tested the patchset with the 57bit-enabled machines with DPDK VA
mode running in the guest? That would be something nice to mention in
the cover letter if you have.

[...]

> @@ -3264,11 +3286,19 @@ static bool vtd_decide_config(IntelIOMMUState *s, Error **errp)
>          }
>      }
>  
> -    /* Currently only address widths supported are 39 and 48 bits */
> +    /* Currently address widths supported are 39, 48, and 57 bits */
>      if ((s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_39BIT) &&
> -        (s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_48BIT)) {
> -        error_setg(errp, "Supported values for x-aw-bits are: %d, %d",
> -                   VTD_AW_39BIT, VTD_AW_48BIT);
> +        (s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_48BIT) &&
> +        (s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_57BIT)) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "Supported values for x-aw-bits are: %d, %d, %d",
> +                   VTD_AW_39BIT, VTD_AW_48BIT, VTD_AW_57BIT);
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +
> +    if ((s->aw_bits == VTD_AW_57BIT) &&
> +        !(host_has_la57() && guest_has_la57())) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "Do not support 57-bit DMA address, unless both "
> +                         "host and guest are capable of 5-level paging.\n");

Is there any context (or pointer to previous discussions would work
too) on explaining why we don't support some scenarios like
host_paw=48,guest_paw=48,guest_gaw=57?

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu