From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PCI / iommu / thunderbolt: IOMMU based DMA protection Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:32:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20181113113232.GU2500@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20181112160628.86620-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20181113085424.GC25808@8bytes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181113085424.GC25808@8bytes.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joerg Roedel Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, David Woodhouse , Lu Baolu , Ashok Raj , Bjorn Helgaas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jacob jun Pan , Andreas Noever , Michael Jamet , Yehezkel Bernat , Lukas Wunner , Christian Kellner , Mario.Limonciello@dell.com, Anthony Wong , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 09:54:24AM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 07:06:24PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > Lu Baolu (1): > > iommu/vt-d: Force IOMMU on for platform opt in hint > > > > Mika Westerberg (3): > > PCI / ACPI: Identify external PCI devices > > iommu/vt-d: Do not enable ATS for external devices > > thunderbolt: Export IOMMU based DMA protection support to userspace > > Looks good to me. Which tree should go this trough? In case its not the > IOMMU tree, for the iommu-parts: I was thinking to take them through Thunderbolt tree. > Acked-by: Joerg Roedel > Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel Thanks!