From: Clement Viel <vielclement@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sim800: add sim800 support.
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:11:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113171122.GA5403@turing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b43cbce4-36b6-ecf0-0647-27efe2496c2c@norrbonn.se>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5966 bytes --]
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 05:53:56PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13/11/2018 16:33, Clement Viel wrote:
> >---
> > plugins/sim900.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/plugins/sim900.c b/plugins/sim900.c
> >index a7728cd..f280e5e 100644
> >--- a/plugins/sim900.c
> >+++ b/plugins/sim900.c
> >@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> > #endif
> > #include <errno.h>
> >+#include <string.h>
> > #include <stdlib.h>
> > #include <glib.h>
> > #include <gatchat.h>
> >@@ -60,13 +61,77 @@ static char *dlc_prefixes[NUM_DLC] = { "Voice: ", "Net: ", "SMS: ",
> > static const char *none_prefix[] = { NULL };
> >+enum type {
> >+ SIM800,
> >+ SIM900,
> >+ SIMCOM_UNKNOWN,
> >+};
> >+
>
> Makes more sense to have UNKNOWN be the first entry in the enumeration.
You're right !
>
> > struct sim900_data {
> > GIOChannel *device;
> > GAtMux *mux;
> > GAtChat * dlcs[NUM_DLC];
> > guint frame_size;
> >+ enum type modem_type;
> > };
> >+static void set_modem_type (const char *type, struct ofono_modem *modem)
> >+{
> >+ struct sim900_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
> >+
> >+ if (strcmp(type, "sim800") == 0)
> >+ data->modem_type = SIM800;
> >+ else if (strcmp(type, "sim900") == 0)
> >+ data->modem_type = SIM900;
> >+ else
> >+ data->modem_type = SIMCOM_UNKNOWN;
> >+ DBG("modem type is %d",data->modem_type);
> >+}
> >+
> >+static void mux_ready_notify(GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
> >+{
> >+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
> >+ struct sim900_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
> >+ struct ofono_gprs *gprs = NULL;
> >+ struct ofono_gprs_context *gc;
> >+
> >+ ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
> >+ data->dlcs[SMS_DLC]);
> >+
> >+ gprs = ofono_gprs_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->dlcs[GPRS_DLC]);
> >+ if (gprs == NULL)
> >+ return;
> >+
> >+ gc = ofono_gprs_context_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM,
> >+ "atmodem", data->dlcs[GPRS_DLC]);
> >+ if (gc)
> >+ ofono_gprs_add_context(gprs, gc);
> >+
> >+
> >+}
> >+
> >+static void check_model(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
> >+{
> >+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
> >+ GAtResultIter iter;
> >+ char const *model;
> >+
> >+ DBG("");
> >+
> >+ g_at_result_iter_init(&iter, result);
> >+
> >+ while (g_at_result_iter_next(&iter, NULL)) {
> >+ if (!g_at_result_iter_next_unquoted_string(&iter, &model))
> >+ continue;
>
> The documentation doesn't indicate that the model type is given as an
> arbitrary string at a random location in the response. It's pretty specific
> about the SIM800/SIM900 token appearing as the first element of the
> response. Is the documentation not correct on this point?
>
> >+
> >+ DBG("setting type %s", model);
> >+ if (strstr(model, "SIM800"))
> >+ set_modem_type("sim800", modem);
>
> Instead of doing this dance with strings, just directly set the type:
>
> data->modem_type = SIM800;
>
>
Right again.
> >+ else if (strstr(model, "SIM900"))
> >+ set_modem_type("sim900", modem);
> >+ }
> >+}
> >+
> > static int sim900_probe(struct ofono_modem *modem)
> > {
> > struct sim900_data *data;
> >@@ -78,7 +143,6 @@ static int sim900_probe(struct ofono_modem *modem)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > ofono_modem_set_data(modem, data);
> >-
>
> Whitespace.
>
> > return 0;
> > }
> >@@ -111,6 +175,7 @@ static GAtChat *open_device(struct ofono_modem *modem,
> > GHashTable *options;
> > device = ofono_modem_get_string(modem, key);
> >+
>
> Ditto.
>
> > if (device == NULL)
> > return NULL;
> >@@ -232,6 +297,11 @@ static void setup_internal_mux(struct ofono_modem *modem)
> > goto error;
> > }
> > }
> >+ if (data->modem_type == SIM800) {
> >+ for (i = 0; i<NUM_DLC; i++) {
> >+ g_at_chat_register(data->dlcs[i], "SMS Ready", mux_ready_notify, FALSE, modem, NULL);
> >+ }
> >+ }
> > ofono_modem_set_powered(modem, TRUE);
> >@@ -294,6 +364,7 @@ static int sim900_enable(struct ofono_modem *modem)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > g_at_chat_send(data->dlcs[SETUP_DLC], "ATE0", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> >+ g_at_chat_send(data->dlcs[SETUP_DLC], "AT+CGMM", NULL,check_model, modem, NULL);
> > /* For obtain correct sms service number */
> > g_at_chat_send(data->dlcs[SETUP_DLC], "AT+CSCS=\"GSM\"", NULL,
> >@@ -353,18 +424,20 @@ static void sim900_post_sim(struct ofono_modem *modem)
> > DBG("%p", modem);
> >- ofono_phonebook_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->dlcs[VOICE_DLC]);
> >- ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
> >+ if (data->modem_type != SIM800) {
> >+ ofono_phonebook_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->dlcs[VOICE_DLC]);
> >+ ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
> > data->dlcs[SMS_DLC]);
> >- gprs = ofono_gprs_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->dlcs[GPRS_DLC]);
> >- if (gprs == NULL)
> >- return;
> >+ gprs = ofono_gprs_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->dlcs[GPRS_DLC]);
> >+ if (gprs == NULL)
> >+ return;
> >- gc = ofono_gprs_context_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM_SIM900,
> >+ gc = ofono_gprs_context_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM_SIM900,
> > "atmodem", data->dlcs[GPRS_DLC]);
> >- if (gc)
> >- ofono_gprs_add_context(gprs, gc);
> >+ if (gc)
> >+ ofono_gprs_add_context(gprs, gc);
> >+ }
>
> All this is duplicated in mux_ready_notify... maybe move it a function of
> its own...?
this is duplicated because the ofono atoms cannot be created at the same point for the two modems :
for sim800, we must wait for an URC stating that channels have been created whereas sim900 is much straightforward.
That's why i've splitted : one in post_sim (sim900) another in mux_ready_notify (sim800).
>
> > }
> > static void sim900_post_online(struct ofono_modem *modem)
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-13 15:33 [PATCH 1/3] sim800: add sim800 support Clement Viel
2018-11-13 16:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2018-11-13 17:11 ` Clement Viel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-11-13 17:19 Clement Viel
2018-11-14 20:34 ` Denis Kenzior
2018-11-13 9:29 Clement Viel
2018-11-13 11:59 ` Giacinto Cifelli
2018-11-13 15:00 ` Clement Viel
2018-11-13 15:04 ` Marcel Holtmann
2018-11-13 15:11 ` Jonas Bonn
2018-11-13 15:28 ` Clement Viel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181113171122.GA5403@turing \
--to=vielclement@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.