From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: Do not rely on blk-mq for double completions
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:10:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181114181007.GD11416@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181114180018.GC11416@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:00:18AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 09:51:36AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Regarding this patch: I think this patch introduces a subtle but severe bug
> > in the SCSI core, namely that if an abort is processed concurrently with
> > request completion with "fake timeout" enabled that the abort is ignored.
>
> That requires the following occur concurrently:
>
> 1. A real completion
> 2. A real timeout
> 3. A fake timeout
>
> That can't happen on a production kernel, and highly improbable
> on the fake one. We can still fix it by having scsi timeout return
> BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER in this case. I didn't like adding code just to work
> around error injection, but there isn't a good alternative at the moment.
So do this instead:
--8<---
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
index ff372b335ced..d343024e732a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -199,9 +199,6 @@ scsi_abort_command(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
return FAILED;
}
- if (test_and_set_bit(__SCMD_COMPLETE, &scmd->flags))
- return SUCCESS;
-
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
if (shost->eh_deadline != -1 && !shost->last_reset)
shost->last_reset = jiffies;
@@ -299,6 +296,8 @@ enum blk_eh_timer_return scsi_times_out(struct request *req)
rtn = host->hostt->eh_timed_out(scmd);
if (rtn == BLK_EH_DONE) {
+ if (test_and_set_bit(__SCMD_COMPLETE, &scmd->flags))
+ return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
if (scsi_abort_command(scmd) != SUCCESS) {
set_host_byte(scmd, DID_TIME_OUT);
scsi_eh_scmd_add(scmd);
-->8---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-14 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-14 16:25 [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Return true if request was completed Keith Busch
2018-11-14 16:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: Do not rely on blk-mq for double completions Keith Busch
2018-11-14 17:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-14 18:00 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-14 18:10 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-11-14 16:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Simplify request completion state Keith Busch
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-11-15 17:56 [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Return true if request was completed Keith Busch
2018-11-15 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: Do not rely on blk-mq for double completions Keith Busch
2018-11-15 17:57 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181114181007.GD11416@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.