Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] kms_content_protection: Fix log bug on 32-bit platforms.

["Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>]

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:28:29PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> long is different between 32 and 64 and should basically never be
> used.  Fixes compiler warning about passing the wrong type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
> ---
>  tests/kms_content_protection.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/kms_content_protection.c b/tests/kms_content_protection.c
> index 801eff66c272..bb9ecd3f4cde 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_content_protection.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_content_protection.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ wait_for_prop_value(igt_output_t *output, uint64_t expected,
>  			return true;
>  		usleep(1000);
>  	}
> -	igt_info("prop_value mismatch %ld != %ld\n", val, expected);
> +	igt_info("prop_value mismatch %lld != %lld\n",
> +		 (long long)val, (long long)expected);

We use the ugly PRId64 & co. elsewhere for this.

Also FYI we have an igt-dev list now, so should post there rather than
on intel-gfx.

>  
>  	return false;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx