From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/fpu: Disable BH while while loading FPU registers in __fpu__restore_sig() Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:41:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20181119174138.GG14688@zn.tnic> References: <20181119160410.ne7oiq2gkwt6jiqg@linutronix.de> <20181119171128.2lxnhga3pym2zlok@linutronix.de> <20181119172743.GE14688@zn.tnic> <20181119173135.sqxemqwfpuzszyfb@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Rik van Riel , Dave Hansen To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181119173135.sqxemqwfpuzszyfb@linutronix.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:31:36PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > I though about __fpregs_changes_begin() in the last patch of the commit: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bigeasy/staging.git/commit/?h=x86_fpu_rtu_v4 Also a good spot - api.h talks about preemption already so sure, why not. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.