From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: trini@konsulko.com (Tom Rini) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:52:17 -0500 Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] u-boot: Add mkenvimage tool In-Reply-To: References: <20181119100443.2882-1-abrodkin@synopsys.com> <1fd9e473-66ba-bbb8-87a9-32bb78e359e3@denx.de> <20181119190835.GO11247@bill-the-cat> <153f5864c09a48adb8c976d8671f3c46@XBOX04.axis.com> List-ID: Message-ID: <20181120155217.GA11247@bill-the-cat> To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 20, 2018@01:48:40PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018@1:40 PM Burton, Ross wrote: > > > > (hit sent too early) > > > > Of course how big are these tools, and is it really useful splitting > > them up? If we're talking a 10k binary, is putting them in separate > > packages worth the complication? > > I think it makes sense to split; we are building an embedded system > build system and granular installation is a must have. Using PN to > install all tools is a win win combination. Agreed. The common use cases won't need all of the possible tools so lets not grow sizes we don't need to grow. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yb1-f195.google.com (mail-yb1-f195.google.com [209.85.219.195]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650976C491 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-f195.google.com with SMTP id u103-v6so917934ybi.5 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:52:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=konsulko.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PvEhYkNfdrQmw3igliSq2RApJzbS78EfwohZ9RFCi+U=; b=jXCXhCAiiLZ+TWruFiH48LhfMC4tDygBjAYKKS7q354bg5Jmo2H4lpJZOZHhCmtSTb MngWlH1pf+nE6m/LOARkV148C/JSUo7vfCJkSDzr2UtpKWG4aBOsEhuhmKPGOJTKCevz TeV86rBBp1h1J4pg24EKpXXwW6Sd0mJnabzIM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PvEhYkNfdrQmw3igliSq2RApJzbS78EfwohZ9RFCi+U=; b=m2uYdl1kT7QCfF5mc5GBh3eXnbPe8ffl6PZ1uXJ5sA+KVhtP0dzpS0UoD8uwzfCRmN qprH/SgTjEhfW2p9Xpe1xc6YVLaQzu4f2HgihvAWfsEonsAYfVjRxPLlQRHKYiKOiqb7 Z3hpQiXc7nnnfTmLhblUX7m8AlmdXnGizLXgeFJg1yxJBqEgebYwLW8BkSliUPh60A3L M5wGp11np6O8PTtR26KPNZfd651etSgglO/MS8yqr6PGmtyXvIsmk6jvKw0ZRitICwL+ xdrEGzDgtlsbStcDljl3j2MV1OxDYEryO0QffLolN7Kbc3j4diXZ0OLwW/YHv5R1rw6g uizQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbr7kJHQ1MB8i6WTbySHwU7qYpEGlnO/VyxDg+2Ybn6+OUihRdF DVpouySfpiARBfRc8T6nFshbDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5et5aOzjfWtvBMsGXw7ysIKlNfICzGzu3s/yTda/zSoIg8M8VDK0Zj0LrmmBk79VhwMNyB9fw== X-Received: by 2002:a25:5b54:: with SMTP id p81-v6mr2245844ybb.339.1542729141166; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:52:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from bill-the-cat (cpe-65-184-133-47.ec.res.rr.com. [65.184.133.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l16sm4903335ywa.25.2018.11.20.07.52.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:52:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:52:17 -0500 From: Tom Rini To: Otavio Salvador Message-ID: <20181120155217.GA11247@bill-the-cat> References: <20181119100443.2882-1-abrodkin@synopsys.com> <1fd9e473-66ba-bbb8-87a9-32bb78e359e3@denx.de> <20181119190835.GO11247@bill-the-cat> <153f5864c09a48adb8c976d8671f3c46@XBOX04.axis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: Marek Vasut , Otavio Salvador , Alexey Brodkin , Peter Kjellerstedt , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] u-boot: Add mkenvimage tool X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:52:20 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 118403 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6y91TzBqz7AtkeNG" Content-Disposition: inline --6y91TzBqz7AtkeNG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:48:40PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:40 PM Burton, Ross wrot= e: > > > > (hit sent too early) > > > > Of course how big are these tools, and is it really useful splitting > > them up? If we're talking a 10k binary, is putting them in separate > > packages worth the complication? >=20 > I think it makes sense to split; we are building an embedded system > build system and granular installation is a must have. Using PN to > install all tools is a win win combination. Agreed. The common use cases won't need all of the possible tools so lets not grow sizes we don't need to grow. --=20 Tom --6y91TzBqz7AtkeNG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJb9C2xAAoJEIf59jXTHXZSHhsP/ia5mfo/Sqw0K/P+LreNspXA GIUbh72neIbJRGz4anRXS21klG324SvdGlEa73w6gUPEOZW2sejeRfS4GMYpJe/s lrm5j6ZS4AKvLdp77a00Gp6rQX8smVSGQSGysl5GBJbixOpb3WeSIhpCHh+sKrOh Z6M3E/+N5Rm91/jfXdsGj9sTe9oho8Vezh5By76g1ua+/NrF4OGc/XIsAoyOt7cP Upb1gNeLsUrMMQDa90YUWnEX+7Yh805spqBakCsPrqpf7/M/cfzEXzhLip2UIjtL Cv+AXwM0iM9gO/OH51SmIwYT9KCzWsnd5EXZ6CQb0cYJveDa9FrwC0ofNS8rxh1K mnXPP9IKZvB90PRUweqxZ+nxAnx7MHr6KV5cAg7h4vPSbiPt2/rY5RjPLAX/AWGV mc6nnt7QNNlURD28eIyL9E5wlUkE7mTuaTuMiHxDgDcaQ8IYqmz8Qj/ss7pXVxmo pmpN2apdlc2/cpDJ9bHqqNC7cXZ9fenbE86zOS3qhLx2KlxF0dHd110GdszFPfuW yWOkY7WWKxCb+glgoYrPFEPL6k6q6i/3byqZIVapVw1bSrCy6Po5kmjsgstXBUvw TL0TFzdRwuWBvMfUYm8dJILzHOgXkzNtHvPta+OtwZgXJS9Mh38J5DofuqxCOkSa GDZlTHbQEkPc/v5+lPp8 =m8Fu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6y91TzBqz7AtkeNG--