From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] nvme: enable multipathing by default
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:47:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181120184749.GF26707@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181120162734.2013-2-hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018@05:27:32PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> And make it a little more clear that the only reason to disable it is
> to optimize for size in constrained environment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig b/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig
> index 88a8b5916624..d2ae6954ce7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig
> @@ -16,12 +16,20 @@ config BLK_DEV_NVME
> config NVME_MULTIPATH
> bool "NVMe multipath support"
> depends on NVME_CORE
> + default y
> ---help---
> This option enables support for multipath access to NVMe
> subsystems. If this option is enabled only a single
> /dev/nvmeXnY device will show up for each NVMe namespaces,
> even if it is accessible through multiple controllers.
>
> + Say Y here unless you need to optimize for size in embedded
> + systems that are never going to see multi-port NVMe devices.
> +
> + If you say N multiple ports of the same subsystem will show
> + up as separate devices, and none of the normal block device
> + exclusion mechanisms will work.
> +
> config NVME_FABRICS
> tristate
This is okay with me, but I have one little follow-on I'd like to RFC here:
The /dev/nvme naming convention with multiplath has broken people's
minds, and making it default will invite a lot of repeat questions on
how to match up block to admin handles.
Could we promote /dev/nvme0 to be a subsystem handle instead of a
controller handle, and add new per-controller handles, like /dev/nvme0c1,
nvme0c2, etc...? The subsystem handle's management interface can just use
the first active controller to forward admin commands, and per-controller
specific administration can be taught to use the new handles as needed.
Tooling shouldn't care about the names, but I am not sure if this could
possibly break productino scripts. The naming disconnect has broken
some things, though, so I hope this doesn't end up being a pick your
poision suggestion...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-20 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-20 16:27 tweak multipath kconfig and options Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 16:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme: enable multipathing by default Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 18:47 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-11-21 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-22 2:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-26 15:40 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-20 16:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme: warn when finding multi-port subsystems without multipathing enabled Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-22 2:45 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-20 16:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: deprecate the multipath=0 module option Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-22 2:49 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-27 15:06 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] " Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181120184749.GF26707@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.