All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20181120211335.GC22801@google.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index dee428b..bfd1815 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,28 +1,28 @@
 On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:02:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
 > 
-> > On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
+> > On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes <joel at joelfernandes.org> wrote:
 > > 
 > >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
 > >> 
-> >>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
+> >>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
 > >>> 
 > >>> Hi Joel,
 > >>> 
-> >>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
+> >>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes <joel at joelfernandes.org> wrote:
 > >>>>> 
 > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
 > >>>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
-> >>>>> <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:  
+> >>>>> <joel at joelfernandes.org> wrote:  
 > >>>>>> 
 > >>>>>> A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
 > >>>>>> where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same
 > >>>>>> behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by
 > >>>>>> Andy [2].
 > >>>>>> 
-> >>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781@google.com/
-> >>>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74@amacapital.net/
+> >>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781 at google.com/
+> >>>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74 at amacapital.net/
 > >>>>>> 
-> >>>>>> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
+> >>>>>> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org>
 > >>>>>> Fixes: 5e653c2923fd ("mm: Add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd")  
 > >>>>> 
 > >>>>> What tree is that commit in?  Can we not just fold this in?  
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 636b553..9d24ca2 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,51 +5,36 @@
  "ref\0469B80CB-D982-4802-A81D-95AC493D7E87@amacapital.net\0"
  "ref\020181120204710.GB22801@google.com\0"
  "ref\0F8E28229-C99E-4711-982B-5B5DE0F70F16@amacapital.net\0"
- "From\0Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust\0"
+ "From\0joel at joelfernandes.org (Joel Fernandes)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:13:35 -0800\0"
- "To\0Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>\0"
- "Cc\0Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>"
-  Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
-  LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
-  Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-  Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
-  Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
-  Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
-  Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
-  open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
-  Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
-  marcandre.lureau@redhat.com
-  Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
-  Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
- " Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:02:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:\n"
  "> \n"
- "> > On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:\n"
+ "> > On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes <joel at joelfernandes.org> wrote:\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:\n"
  "> >> \n"
- "> >>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:\n"
+ "> >>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:\n"
  "> >>> \n"
  "> >>> Hi Joel,\n"
  "> >>> \n"
- "> >>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:\n"
+ "> >>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes <joel at joelfernandes.org> wrote:\n"
  "> >>>>> \n"
  "> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:\n"
  "> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)\n"
- "> >>>>> <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:  \n"
+ "> >>>>> <joel at joelfernandes.org> wrote:  \n"
  "> >>>>>> \n"
  "> >>>>>> A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week\n"
  "> >>>>>> where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same\n"
  "> >>>>>> behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by\n"
  "> >>>>>> Andy [2].\n"
  "> >>>>>> \n"
- "> >>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781@google.com/\n"
- "> >>>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74@amacapital.net/\n"
+ "> >>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781 at google.com/\n"
+ "> >>>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74 at amacapital.net/\n"
  "> >>>>>> \n"
- "> >>>>>> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>\n"
+ "> >>>>>> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org>\n"
  "> >>>>>> Fixes: 5e653c2923fd (\"mm: Add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd\")  \n"
  "> >>>>> \n"
  "> >>>>> What tree is that commit in?  Can we not just fold this in?  \n"
@@ -90,4 +75,4 @@
  "\n"
   - Joel
 
-1efe53d46176ac9ff9d89e229f05fc1da4459c31aa2888840849454ab57beb6f
+442641a5b22abd194df7319d004ebfec24603d05a3d4a22b9cfb5da734d75d87

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index dee428b..4ca0060 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -1,28 +1,28 @@
-On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:02:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
+On Tue, Nov 20, 2018@02:02:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
 > 
-> > On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
+> > On Nov 20, 2018,@1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
 > > 
-> >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
+> >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018@01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
 > >> 
-> >>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
+> >>> On Nov 20, 2018,@1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
 > >>> 
 > >>> Hi Joel,
 > >>> 
 > >>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
 > >>>>> 
-> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
+> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018@07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
 > >>>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
-> >>>>> <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:  
+> >>>>> <joel at joelfernandes.org> wrote:  
 > >>>>>> 
 > >>>>>> A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
 > >>>>>> where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same
 > >>>>>> behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by
 > >>>>>> Andy [2].
 > >>>>>> 
-> >>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781@google.com/
-> >>>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74@amacapital.net/
+> >>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781 at google.com/
+> >>>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74 at amacapital.net/
 > >>>>>> 
-> >>>>>> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
+> >>>>>> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org>
 > >>>>>> Fixes: 5e653c2923fd ("mm: Add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd")  
 > >>>>> 
 > >>>>> What tree is that commit in?  Can we not just fold this in?  
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 636b553..f660591 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -5,51 +5,36 @@
  "ref\0469B80CB-D982-4802-A81D-95AC493D7E87@amacapital.net\0"
  "ref\020181120204710.GB22801@google.com\0"
  "ref\0F8E28229-C99E-4711-982B-5B5DE0F70F16@amacapital.net\0"
- "From\0Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust\0"
+ "From\0joel@joelfernandes.org (Joel Fernandes)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:13:35 -0800\0"
- "To\0Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>\0"
- "Cc\0Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>"
-  Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
-  LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
-  Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-  Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
-  Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
-  Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
-  Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
-  open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
-  Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
-  marcandre.lureau@redhat.com
-  Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
-  Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
- " Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:02:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:\n"
+ "On Tue, Nov 20, 2018@02:02:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:\n"
  "> \n"
- "> > On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:\n"
+ "> > On Nov 20, 2018,@1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:\n"
  "> > \n"
- "> >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:\n"
+ "> >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018@01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:\n"
  "> >> \n"
- "> >>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:\n"
+ "> >>> On Nov 20, 2018,@1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:\n"
  "> >>> \n"
  "> >>> Hi Joel,\n"
  "> >>> \n"
  "> >>>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:\n"
  "> >>>>> \n"
- "> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:\n"
+ "> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018@07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:\n"
  "> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)\n"
- "> >>>>> <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:  \n"
+ "> >>>>> <joel at joelfernandes.org> wrote:  \n"
  "> >>>>>> \n"
  "> >>>>>> A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week\n"
  "> >>>>>> where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same\n"
  "> >>>>>> behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by\n"
  "> >>>>>> Andy [2].\n"
  "> >>>>>> \n"
- "> >>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781@google.com/\n"
- "> >>>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74@amacapital.net/\n"
+ "> >>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781 at google.com/\n"
+ "> >>>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74 at amacapital.net/\n"
  "> >>>>>> \n"
- "> >>>>>> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>\n"
+ "> >>>>>> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org>\n"
  "> >>>>>> Fixes: 5e653c2923fd (\"mm: Add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd\")  \n"
  "> >>>>> \n"
  "> >>>>> What tree is that commit in?  Can we not just fold this in?  \n"
@@ -90,4 +75,4 @@
  "\n"
   - Joel
 
-1efe53d46176ac9ff9d89e229f05fc1da4459c31aa2888840849454ab57beb6f
+d5a41fc3552c2a5cc0d4ffd6d188acebc6a095a2aff6622728bdcf7d9a0a719e

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt
index dee428b..8a611c2 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N3/1.txt
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:02:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
 > > I wouldn't go so far to call it nonsense. It was a working patch, it just did
 > > things differently. Your help with improving the patch is much appreciated.
 > 
-> I’m not saying the patch is nonsense — I’m saying the *hash* may be
+> Ia??m not saying the patch is nonsense a?? Ia??m saying the *hash* may be
 > nonsense. akpm uses a bunch of .patch files and all kinds of crazy scripts,
 > and the mmotm.git tree is not stable at all.
 > 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest
index 636b553..5449ba6 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N3/content_digest
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
  "> > I wouldn't go so far to call it nonsense. It was a working patch, it just did\n"
  "> > things differently. Your help with improving the patch is much appreciated.\n"
  "> \n"
- "> I\342\200\231m not saying the patch is nonsense \342\200\224 I\342\200\231m saying the *hash* may be\n"
+ "> Ia??m not saying the patch is nonsense a?? Ia??m saying the *hash* may be\n"
  "> nonsense. akpm uses a bunch of .patch files and all kinds of crazy scripts,\n"
  "> and the mmotm.git tree is not stable at all.\n"
  "> \n"
@@ -90,4 +90,4 @@
  "\n"
   - Joel
 
-1efe53d46176ac9ff9d89e229f05fc1da4459c31aa2888840849454ab57beb6f
+d4cbd24e3a73ec75210e8ac8354375fc5de3634d2be968ae982a1e767536be19

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.