All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20181125132257.6ae9fe82@archlinux>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 8b78954..974ab5a 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,28 +1,24 @@
 On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:13:40 +0800
 Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@endlessm.com> wrote:
 
-> Denis CIOCCA <denis.ciocca@st.com> =E6=96=BC 2018=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8820=
-=E6=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=BA=8C =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=883:05=E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=
-=9A
+> Denis CIOCCA <denis.ciocca@st.com> 於 2018年11月20日 週二 上午3:05寫道:
 > >
 > > Hi Jian,
 > >
 > > Not clear to me why should be + instead of *.
 > >
-> > ODR is expressed in Hz, so (1/Hz) =3D period in seconds (1 sample sampl=
-ing time) [s]
-> > 1000 * (1/Hz) =3D period in milliseconds (1 sample sampling time) [ms]
-> > n * 1000 * (1/Hz) =3D n times period in milliseconds (n times sample sa=
-mpling time) [ms]
+> > ODR is expressed in Hz, so (1/Hz) = period in seconds (1 sample sampling time) [s]
+> > 1000 * (1/Hz) = period in milliseconds (1 sample sampling time) [ms]
+> > n * 1000 * (1/Hz) = n times period in milliseconds (n times sample sampling time) [ms]
 > >
-> > In your case you assume bootime is in milliseconds. =20
->=20
+> > In your case you assume bootime is in milliseconds.  
+> 
 > Yes, I assume that according to the original comment.
->=20
-> >Maybe we can change the comment and use 'number of samples ...'. =20
->=20
+> 
+> >Maybe we can change the comment and use 'number of samples ...'.  
+> 
 > Making the meaning more clear is better.
->=20
+> 
 > However, does the bootime of the measurement need as the long time to
 > be enabled?
 > If the sampling rate is 1Hz and n is 2, then they will do msleep with
@@ -37,27 +33,21 @@ I'm not understanding why this is unexpected?
 
 Jonathan
 
->=20
+> 
 > Regards,
 > Jian-Hong Pan
->=20
+> 
 > >
 > >
 > > -----Original Message-----
-> > From: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org>=
- On Behalf Of Jian-Hong Pan
+> > From: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Jian-Hong Pan
 > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2018 10:12 PM
-> > To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>; Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.d=
-e>; Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>; Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pm=
-eerw.net>; Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
-> > Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux@endl=
-essm.com; Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@endlessm.com>
+> > To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>; Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>; Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>; Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>; Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
+> > Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux@endlessm.com; Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@endlessm.com>
 > > Subject: [PATCH] iio: st_sensors: Fix the sleep time for sampling
 > >
-> > According to the description of st_sensor_settings and st_sensor_data s=
-tructures' comments:
-> > - bootime: samples to discard when sensor passing from power-down to po=
-wer-up.
+> > According to the description of st_sensor_settings and st_sensor_data structures' comments:
+> > - bootime: samples to discard when sensor passing from power-down to power-up.
 > > - odr: Output data rate of the sensor [Hz].
 > >
 > > The sleep time should be
@@ -68,23 +58,19 @@ wer-up.
 > >  drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c | 2 +-
 > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 > >
-> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c b/drivers/=
-iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
+> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
 > > index 26fbd1bd9413..6b87ea657a92 100644
 > > --- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
 > > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
-> > @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int st_sensors_read_info_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_=
-dev,
+> > @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int st_sensors_read_info_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 > >                 if (err < 0)
 > >                         goto out;
 > >
-> > -               msleep((sdata->sensor_settings->bootime * 1000) / sdata=
-->odr);
-> > +               msleep(sdata->sensor_settings->bootime + 1000 / sdata->=
-odr);
-> >                 err =3D st_sensors_read_axis_data(indio_dev, ch, val);
+> > -               msleep((sdata->sensor_settings->bootime * 1000) / sdata->odr);
+> > +               msleep(sdata->sensor_settings->bootime + 1000 / sdata->odr);
+> >                 err = st_sensors_read_axis_data(indio_dev, ch, val);
 > >                 if (err < 0)
 > >                         goto out;
 > > --
 > > 2.11.0
-> > =20
+> >
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index e89840f..eba7d50 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -18,28 +18,24 @@
  "On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:13:40 +0800\n"
  "Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@endlessm.com> wrote:\n"
  "\n"
- "> Denis CIOCCA <denis.ciocca@st.com> =E6=96=BC 2018=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8820=\n"
- "=E6=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=BA=8C =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=883:05=E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=\n"
- "=9A\n"
+ "> Denis CIOCCA <denis.ciocca@st.com> \346\226\274 2018\345\271\26411\346\234\21020\346\227\245 \351\200\261\344\272\214 \344\270\212\345\215\2103:05\345\257\253\351\201\223\357\274\232\n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > Hi Jian,\n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > Not clear to me why should be + instead of *.\n"
  "> >\n"
- "> > ODR is expressed in Hz, so (1/Hz) =3D period in seconds (1 sample sampl=\n"
- "ing time) [s]\n"
- "> > 1000 * (1/Hz) =3D period in milliseconds (1 sample sampling time) [ms]\n"
- "> > n * 1000 * (1/Hz) =3D n times period in milliseconds (n times sample sa=\n"
- "mpling time) [ms]\n"
+ "> > ODR is expressed in Hz, so (1/Hz) = period in seconds (1 sample sampling time) [s]\n"
+ "> > 1000 * (1/Hz) = period in milliseconds (1 sample sampling time) [ms]\n"
+ "> > n * 1000 * (1/Hz) = n times period in milliseconds (n times sample sampling time) [ms]\n"
  "> >\n"
- "> > In your case you assume bootime is in milliseconds. =20\n"
- ">=20\n"
+ "> > In your case you assume bootime is in milliseconds.  \n"
+ "> \n"
  "> Yes, I assume that according to the original comment.\n"
- ">=20\n"
- "> >Maybe we can change the comment and use 'number of samples ...'. =20\n"
- ">=20\n"
+ "> \n"
+ "> >Maybe we can change the comment and use 'number of samples ...'.  \n"
+ "> \n"
  "> Making the meaning more clear is better.\n"
- ">=20\n"
+ "> \n"
  "> However, does the bootime of the measurement need as the long time to\n"
  "> be enabled?\n"
  "> If the sampling rate is 1Hz and n is 2, then they will do msleep with\n"
@@ -54,27 +50,21 @@
  "\n"
  "Jonathan\n"
  "\n"
- ">=20\n"
+ "> \n"
  "> Regards,\n"
  "> Jian-Hong Pan\n"
- ">=20\n"
+ "> \n"
  "> >\n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > -----Original Message-----\n"
- "> > From: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org>=\n"
- " On Behalf Of Jian-Hong Pan\n"
+ "> > From: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Jian-Hong Pan\n"
  "> > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2018 10:12 PM\n"
- "> > To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>; Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.d=\n"
- "e>; Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>; Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pm=\n"
- "eerw.net>; Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>\n"
- "> > Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux@endl=\n"
- "essm.com; Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@endlessm.com>\n"
+ "> > To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>; Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>; Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>; Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>; Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>\n"
+ "> > Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux@endlessm.com; Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@endlessm.com>\n"
  "> > Subject: [PATCH] iio: st_sensors: Fix the sleep time for sampling\n"
  "> >\n"
- "> > According to the description of st_sensor_settings and st_sensor_data s=\n"
- "tructures' comments:\n"
- "> > - bootime: samples to discard when sensor passing from power-down to po=\n"
- "wer-up.\n"
+ "> > According to the description of st_sensor_settings and st_sensor_data structures' comments:\n"
+ "> > - bootime: samples to discard when sensor passing from power-down to power-up.\n"
  "> > - odr: Output data rate of the sensor [Hz].\n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > The sleep time should be\n"
@@ -85,25 +75,21 @@
  "> >  drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c | 2 +-\n"
  "> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)\n"
  "> >\n"
- "> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c b/drivers/=\n"
- "iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c\n"
+ "> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c\n"
  "> > index 26fbd1bd9413..6b87ea657a92 100644\n"
  "> > --- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c\n"
  "> > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c\n"
- "> > @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int st_sensors_read_info_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_=\n"
- "dev,\n"
+ "> > @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int st_sensors_read_info_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,\n"
  "> >                 if (err < 0)\n"
  "> >                         goto out;\n"
  "> >\n"
- "> > -               msleep((sdata->sensor_settings->bootime * 1000) / sdata=\n"
- "->odr);\n"
- "> > +               msleep(sdata->sensor_settings->bootime + 1000 / sdata->=\n"
- "odr);\n"
- "> >                 err =3D st_sensors_read_axis_data(indio_dev, ch, val);\n"
+ "> > -               msleep((sdata->sensor_settings->bootime * 1000) / sdata->odr);\n"
+ "> > +               msleep(sdata->sensor_settings->bootime + 1000 / sdata->odr);\n"
+ "> >                 err = st_sensors_read_axis_data(indio_dev, ch, val);\n"
  "> >                 if (err < 0)\n"
  "> >                         goto out;\n"
  "> > --\n"
  "> > 2.11.0\n"
- > > =20
+ > >
 
-1dfc9abfa4596babefa02d11a4b9745deb248f003c87183a2eb0e3b05bfc8616
+7e0dbb5c310aaf29fc7a4853b6cb5fdf47dbf42a785941c6259202eaa74b41f8

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.