From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from movementarian.org ([178.79.150.28]:53944 "EHLO movementarian.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726164AbeKZTiC (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:38:02 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:44:36 +0000 From: John Levon Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] sparse: correctly handle "-D foo" and "-U foo". The former is from sparse upstream, but they didn't fix the latter for some reason. Message-ID: <20181126084436.GC10025@movementarian.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181126074909.GI2970@unbuntlaptop> <20181126002734.rmk5kmvtjtol2m2h@ltop.local> Sender: smatch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Luc Van Oostenryck , Dan Carpenter Cc: smatch@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 01:27:35AM +0100, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > Putting this DCO question aside, I would find normal that the commit > message would contains a small note adding something like: > [This patch was originally written by ...] It's in the subject (where it ended up from git format-patch). Dan has already taken me to task for the format of the commits here. > The signed-off-by should be like: > Signed-off-by: Original Author > Signed-off-by: John Levon This sounds awfully like *you've* signed off on *this* patch, but sure, whatever is the usual way. On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:49:09AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > It looks like everything was BCC instead of To: and Cc:? I can't tell > which went to linux-sparse and which smatch@vger.kernel.org. Smatch is > GPL and Sparse is MIT, but any shared code is MIT licensed. I screwed up the mailing (next ones will be better), but they all went to smatch. As being in smatch and not sparse is of no use to us, I thought this made sense right now at least until smatch is nearer upstream. > cherry-pick those two patches. Or John, you could cherry-pick them and > send them to me. `man git cherry-pick`. There's a good few more than just two. If you'd prefer, I can work on taking them upstream first? regards john