All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] generic/050: fix ro blockdev mount of xfs with quota
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:03:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181128030346.GP3889@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181127231955.GA8115@magnolia>

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 03:19:55PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 11:32:36PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 04:19:21PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > 
> > > In XFS, mounting with quota always require a writable device.  If the
> > > block device is read only, the mount fails, which fails this test.
> > > Since this is expected, work around this.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/generic/050 |   23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/generic/050 b/tests/generic/050
> > > index 90e924db..33da228d 100755
> > > --- a/tests/generic/050
> > > +++ b/tests/generic/050
> > > @@ -36,6 +36,21 @@ _require_norecovery
> > >  
> > >  _scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1
> > >  
> > > +filter_ro_mount() {
> > > +	local arg=""
> > > +
> > > +	# Mounting with quota on XFS requires a writable fs, which means
> > > +	# we fail the ro blockdev test with with EPERM.
> > > +	if [ "$FSTYP" = "xfs" ] && echo "$MOUNT_OPTIONS" | grep -q quota ; then
> > > +		arg="s|mount: $SCRATCH_MNT: permission denied|mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only|g"
> > > +	fi
> > > +	sed -e "$arg" | _filter_ro_mount
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +filter_umount() {
> > > +	sed -e "\|umount: $SCRATCH_DEV: not mounted.|d" | _filter_scratch
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  #
> > >  # Mark the device read-only
> > >  #
> > > @@ -46,7 +61,7 @@ blockdev --setro $SCRATCH_DEV
> > >  # Mount it, and make sure we can't write to it, and we can unmount it again
> > >  #
> > >  echo "mounting read-only block device:"
> > > -_try_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount
> > > +_try_scratch_mount 2>&1 | filter_ro_mount
> > >  
> > >  echo "touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail)"
> > >  touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> > 
> > This touch expects a failure message, but with this change applied, test
> > still failed when testing with "-o usrquota,grpquota,prjquota" mount
> > options as
> > 
> >     --- tests/generic/050.out   2018-07-01 20:36:05.796146192 +0800
> >     +++ /root/workspace/xfstests/results//generic/050.out.bad   2018-11-04 23:25:34.551700377 +0800
> >     @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
> >      mounting read-only block device:
> >      mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only
> >      touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail)
> >     -touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/foo': Read-only file system
> 
> Hmm, what kernel is this on?  I've never seen this problem, but maybe I
> just have too many patches everywhere. :/

I cannot remember.. But I think the problem here is that, ro mount with
quota failed but we amended & hid the failure by filter_ro_mount, then
the 'touch' expected a ro-mounted fs, but it actually created a new file
on rootfs without hitting the EROFS error.

Thanks,
Eryu

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-28 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-01 23:19 [PATCH 0/8] fstests: fix quota failures on xfs Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 1/8] quota: clean out speculative preallocations when checking quota usage Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: force unlink metadata updates to disk Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 3/8] generic/050: fix ro blockdev mount of xfs with quota Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-04 15:32   ` Eryu Guan
2018-11-27 23:19     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-28  3:03       ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2018-11-28  3:41         ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 4/8] dump: don't fail if multi-file dumps don't all contain quota info Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs/266: fix restore summary counter when quotas are enabled Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs/205: update for v5 filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 7/8] misc: force the exact quota options coded into the test Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-01 23:19 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: filter out mount options that don't work on v4 filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-04 16:01 ` [PATCH 0/8] fstests: fix quota failures on xfs Eryu Guan
2018-11-06  4:54   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181128030346.GP3889@desktop \
    --to=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.