All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Joey Pabalinas <joeypabalinas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] zram: writeback throttle
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:55:54 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181129015554.GC77327@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181128154141.d67b70957bc4833d9f0d6635@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:41:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:54:29 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On small memory system, there are lots of write IO so if we use
> > flash device as swap, there would be serious flash wearout.
> > To overcome the problem, system developers need to design write
> > limitation strategy to guarantee flash health for entire product life.
> > 
> > This patch creates a new konb "writeback_limit" on zram. With that,
> > if current writeback IO count(/sys/block/zramX/io_stat) excceds

						   bd_stat
		
> > the limitation, zram stops further writeback until admin can reset
> > the limit.
> 
> I'm not really understanding this.  Does this only refer to suspending
> the idle page writeback feature?  Not all zram writeback, surely?

It aims for all zram writeback.

> 
> I don't think the documentation gives an administrator sufficient
> information to effectively use the feature.  Some additional discussion
> would help.  What sort of values should it be set to and why?
> 
> And what is the default setting?  And why?

Default setting is 0 so there is no limitation because we couldn't
expect user's workload of zram.

> 
> And the limit isn't persistent across reboots which makes me wonder
> whether the overall feature is particularly valuable?

Good point.
Keeping the value in persisten across reboot is userspace's role.

I will add this for admin
"
You could know how many of write happens since the system boot
via /sys/block/zramX/bd_stat's bd_writes.
If your backing device has wearout concern, you could limit the
writing via /sys/block/zramX/writeback_limit.

For instance, if the vaule you read bd_writes is 200, you could
set 300 to writeback_limit so upcomding 100 write be only allowed.
If you set the writeback_limit to lower value than current
bd_writes's value, zram allow further writeback without limit.

The value will reset when your system reboot so keeping how many
write happn until now across reboot is user's job.
"


  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-29  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-27  5:54 [PATCH v3 0/7] zram idle page writeback Minchan Kim
2018-11-27  5:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] zram: fix lockdep warning of free block handling Minchan Kim
2018-11-29  2:43   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-11-27  5:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] zram: fix double free backing device Minchan Kim
2018-11-29  2:32   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-11-27  5:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] zram: refactoring flags and writeback stuff Minchan Kim
2018-11-27  5:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] zram: introduce ZRAM_IDLE flag Minchan Kim
2018-11-29  2:29   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-11-27  5:54 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] zram: support idle/huge page writeback Minchan Kim
2018-11-28 23:35   ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-29  1:36     ` Minchan Kim
2018-11-27  5:54 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] zram: add bd_stat statistics Minchan Kim
2018-11-27  5:54 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] zram: writeback throttle Minchan Kim
2018-11-28 23:41   ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-29  1:55     ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2018-11-29  2:23   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-02 23:18     ` Minchan Kim
2018-12-03  2:30       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-03  2:41         ` Minchan Kim
2018-12-03  2:45           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-11-30  4:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] zram idle page writeback Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-02 23:20   ` Minchan Kim
2018-12-02 23:28 ` Joey Pabalinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181129015554.GC77327@google.com \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joeypabalinas@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.