From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, austin_bolen@dell.com,
alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com, keith.busch@intel.com,
Shyam_Iyer@dell.com, lukas@wunner.de,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: Report degraded links via link bandwidth notification
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:06:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181129160625.GC3078@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181129000829.14751-1-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Hi Alexandru,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> A warning is generated when a PCIe device is probed with a degraded
> link, but there was no similar mechanism to warn when the link becomes
> degraded after probing. The Link Bandwidth Notification provides this
> mechanism.
>
> Use the link bandwidth notification interrupt to detect bandwidth
> changes, and rescan the bandwidth, looking for the weakest point. This
> is the same logic used in probe().
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> index 7dd443aea5a5..834672000b59 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> @@ -515,7 +515,8 @@ static irqreturn_t pciehp_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> struct controller *ctrl = (struct controller *)dev_id;
> struct pci_dev *pdev = ctrl_dev(ctrl);
> struct device *parent = pdev->dev.parent;
> - u16 status, events;
> + struct pci_dev *endpoint;
> + u16 status, events, link_status;
Looks better if you write them in opposite order (reverse xmas-tree):
u16 status, events, link_status;
struct pci_dev *endpoint;
> /*
> * Interrupts only occur in D3hot or shallower and only if enabled
> @@ -525,6 +526,17 @@ static irqreturn_t pciehp_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> (!(ctrl->slot_ctrl & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE) && !pciehp_poll_mode))
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> + pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &link_status);
> +
Unnecessary empty line.
> + if (link_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LBMS) {
> + if (pdev->subordinate && pdev->subordinate->self)
> + endpoint = pdev->subordinate->self;
Hmm, I thought pdev->subordinate->self == pdev, no?
> + else
> + endpoint = pdev;
> + __pcie_print_link_status(endpoint, false);
> + pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, link_status);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Keep the port accessible by holding a runtime PM ref on its parent.
> * Defer resume of the parent to the IRQ thread if it's suspended.
> @@ -677,6 +689,24 @@ static int pciehp_poll(void *data)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool pcie_link_bandwidth_notification_supported(struct controller *ctrl)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + u32 cap;
> +
> + ret = pcie_capability_read_dword(ctrl_dev(ctrl), PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &cap);
> + return (ret == PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL) && (cap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_LBNC);
> +}
> +
> +static void pcie_enable_link_bandwidth_notification(struct controller *ctrl)
> +{
> + u16 lnk_ctl;
> +
> + pcie_capability_read_word(ctrl_dev(ctrl), PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &lnk_ctl);
> + lnk_ctl |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LBMIE;
> + pcie_capability_write_word(ctrl_dev(ctrl), PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, lnk_ctl);
> +}
> +
> static void pcie_enable_notification(struct controller *ctrl)
> {
> u16 cmd, mask;
> @@ -713,6 +743,9 @@ static void pcie_enable_notification(struct controller *ctrl)
> pcie_write_cmd_nowait(ctrl, cmd, mask);
> ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "%s: SLOTCTRL %x write cmd %x\n", __func__,
> pci_pcie_cap(ctrl->pcie->port) + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, cmd);
> +
> + if (pcie_link_bandwidth_notification_supported(ctrl))
> + pcie_enable_link_bandwidth_notification(ctrl);
Do we ever need to disable it?
> }
>
> static void pcie_disable_notification(struct controller *ctrl)
> --
> 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-29 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-29 0:08 [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: Report degraded links via link bandwidth notification Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-11-29 16:06 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2018-11-29 19:00 ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-11-29 19:30 ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-29 17:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-29 18:57 ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-11-29 19:13 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-11-29 23:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-29 23:24 ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-12-07 18:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-12-27 19:33 ` Alex G.
2019-02-25 2:28 ` Lukas Wunner
2019-02-27 20:21 ` Alex_Gagniuc
2019-02-28 6:43 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181129160625.GC3078@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Shyam_Iyer@dell.com \
--cc=alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com \
--cc=austin_bolen@dell.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=poza@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.