From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:16:34 -0600 Message-ID: <20181130131633.GU23873@gate.crashing.org> References: <20181003213100.189959-1-namit@vmware.com> <20181007091805.GA30687@zn.tnic> <20181007132228.GJ29268@gate.crashing.org> <20181008073128.GL29268@gate.crashing.org> <20181009145330.GT29268@gate.crashing.org> <20181129122500.GX23873@gate.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: To: Boris Petkov Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Nadav Amit , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , rguenther@suse.de, matz@suse.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , X86 ML , Sam Ravnborg , Alok Kataria , Christopher Li , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jan Beulich , Josh Poimboeuf , Juergen Gross , Kate Stewart , Kees Cook , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , P hilippe Ombredanne , Thomas Gleixner , vir List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:06:02AM +0100, Boris Petkov wrote: > On November 29, 2018 1:25:02 PM GMT+01:00, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >This will only be fixed from GCC 9 on, if the compiler adopts it. The > >kernel wants to support ancient GCC, so it will need to have a > >workaround > >for older GCC versions anyway. > > What about backporting it, like Richard says? Let me first get it into GCC trunk :-) It should backport fine, sure; and I'll work on that. Segher