[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] toolchain: add binutils bug 20765 to linaro Aarch64be

[Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>]

Thomas, All,

On 2018-12-02 17:27 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Sun,  2 Dec 2018 15:04:16 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in
> > index 9e7d2a6233..72d33140da 100644
> > --- a/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in
> > +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external-linaro-aarch64-be/Config.in
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_LINARO_AARCH64_BE
> >  	select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_10
> >  	select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7
> >  	select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_FORTRAN
> > +	select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_BINUTILS_BUG_20765
> Any idea why the aarch64-be toolchain is affected, but not the aarch64
> toolchain ?

I was expecting that question, so I did my homework first, to get ready
to answer it:

    I have no clue about that.

There, that was all I could dig up as a reason. ;-)

But more seriously, I think I'll take that patch back, because the
uopstream BZ is about aarch64, not aarch64be...

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas
> -- 
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'