From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gU5Kc-00057N-8X for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 07:41:24 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 08:41:09 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Martin Kepplinger Cc: Richard Weinberger , Sasha Levin , Sudip Mukherjee , Stable , Artem Bityutskiy , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel , Juergen Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubi: fastmap: Check each mapping only once Message-ID: <20181204074109.GA27141@kroah.com> References: <20181126103842.3249-1-martin.kepplinger@ginzinger.com> <20181202143543.GE221015@sasha-vm> <1678636.EYQpd7BODG@blindfold> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 08:39:16AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > On 02.12.18 16:02, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Sasha, > > > > Am Sonntag, 2. Dezember 2018, 15:35:43 CET schrieb Sasha Levin: > > > On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 11:50:33AM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > Now queued up for 4.14.y, thanks. > > > > > > > > > > can you *please* slow a little down? > > > > > > > > True. It will really help if you can have some sort of fixed schedule > > > > for stable release, like maybe stablerc is ready on Thursday or Friday > > > > and release the stable on Monday. Having a weekend in stablerc will be > > > > helpful for people like me who only get the time in weekends for > > > > upstream or stable kernel. > > > > > > Any sort of schedule will never work for everyone (for example, if it's > > > part of your paid job - you don't necessarily want to review stuff over > > > the weekend). > > > > a schedule is not needed, but please give maintainers at least a chance > > to react on stable inclusion request. > > In this case Martin asked for inclusion on Monday and the patch was applied > > two days later. > > True, especially when the maintainer is asked a question as part of the > patch. > > I've already had the feeling that we'd need the other patch too, but in this > case at least I should have searched for Fixes tags. > > Greg, how about reminding people of Fixes tags in > Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst ? Reminding people how? Patches to that file are always gladly accepted :) thanks, greg k-h