From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: tlc591xx: fix device_node_continue.cocci warnings
 (fwd)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 23:09:18 +0100
Message-ID: <20181206220918.GA32650@amd>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1812062126130.2464@hadrien>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J"
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1812062126130.2464@hadrien>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>, Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@01.org
List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org


--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu 2018-12-06 21:28:16, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> The code seems to be wrong in several ways.  If the continue is wanted,
> the of_node_put is not needed; it will happen on the next iteration.  If
> the continue is not wanted, the of_node_put is needed, and the continue
> should be dropped.

Yep, code is confusing. But the patch is bad, we don't want "continue; retu=
rn;"

Hmm, continue seems more logical to me -- but I guess Jyri should
decde?

									Pavel

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 19:48:54 +0800
> From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> To: kbuild@01.org
> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
> Subject: [PATCH] leds: tlc591xx: fix device_node_continue.cocci warnings
>=20
> CC: kbuild-all@01.org
> TO: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
> CC: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> CC: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
> CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> CC: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>=20
> From: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>=20
> drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c:342:3-14: ERROR: probable double put.
>=20
>  Device node iterators put the previous value of the index variable, so an
>  explicit put causes a double put.
>=20
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/iterators/device_node_continue.cocci
>=20
> Fixes: 7b2d34aaede7 ("leds: tlc591xx: Add gpio output support")
> CC: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> ---
>=20
> tree:   https://github.com/omap-audio/linux-audio peter/ti-linux-4.19.y/w=
ip
> head:   838f24e2deaf1229002bd6555eb7e889b09ac1f9
> commit: 7b2d34aaede727b4abfc78061bbd2202fcd92bc8 [62/67] leds: tlc591xx: =
Add gpio output support
> :::::: branch date: 26 hours ago
> :::::: commit date: 26 hours ago
>=20
> Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
>=20
>  leds-tlc591xx.c |    1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>=20
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c
> @@ -339,7 +339,6 @@ tlc591xx_probe(struct i2c_client *client
>  	for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
>  		err =3D of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &reg);
>  		if (err) {
> -			of_node_put(child);
>  			continue;
>  			return err;
>  		}

--=20
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo=
g.html

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlwJng4ACgkQMOfwapXb+vJvgwCeNZSCkXYhPkheNnMJ4SLmjB01
ZTYAoIbXVR2d3bnSsMgMikgMlOWN6JNJ
=VtYE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--