From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kernel: Fix more -Wmissing-prototypes warnings Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 20:48:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20181207194847.GG9385@zn.tnic> References: <20181205101131.28996-1-bp@alien8.de> <20181205224906.824483ea3c5d1d5b7712c99a@kernel.org> <20181205142448.GH29510@zn.tnic> <20181205162526.GB109259@gmail.com> <20181205171547.GM29510@zn.tnic> <20181207234210.c29731b7a481c74a4e57220c@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181207234210.c29731b7a481c74a4e57220c@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML , Andrew Banman , Dimitri Sivanich , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Mike Travis , "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" , Thomas Gleixner , Yi Wang , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:42:10PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Hmm, I just thought that the symbol only referred from inline asm should > be visible. But if it is OK for any version of supported gcc and clang, > I'm good to remove it. :-) (IOW, I just concerned about older gcc) I just tried two gcc versions: 8.2 and 4.8.5. Both asms looks good: ffffffff81044690 : ... ffffffff810446ab: 41 57 push %r15 ffffffff810446ad: 48 89 e7 mov %rsp,%rdi ffffffff810446b0: e8 db 01 00 00 callq ffffffff81044890 there's the CALL... ffffffff810446b5: 48 89 84 24 98 00 00 mov %rax,0x98(%rsp) ffffffff810446bc: 00 ... and the handler is at the expected address. ffffffff81044890 : ffffffff81044890: e8 ab c9 7b 00 callq ffffffff81801240 <__fentry__> ffffffff81044895: 41 57 push %r15 ffffffff81044897: 41 56 push %r14 ffffffff81044899: 41 55 push %r13 ffffffff8104489b: 49 89 fd mov %rdi,%r13 Dunno, if you feel like there might be some trouble with some compilers, I can keep the hunk below as a separate patch and revert it when it explodes somewhere...? > Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu > > Thank you, > > > > > --- > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c > > index 6480056d370f..308bf103cc73 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c > > @@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ > > > > #include "common.h" > > > > -void *trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs); > > - > > DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL; > > DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk); > > > > @@ -753,7 +751,7 @@ STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(kretprobe_trampoline); > > /* > > * Called from kretprobe_trampoline > > */ > > -__visible __used void *trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) > > +static __used void *trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) > > { > > struct kretprobe_instance *ri = NULL; > > struct hlist_head *head, empty_rp; > > > > -- > > Regards/Gruss, > > Boris. > > > > Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. > > > -- > Masami Hiramatsu -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.