From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Masami Hiramatsu Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kernel: Fix more -Wmissing-prototypes warnings Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 00:21:22 +0900 Message-ID: <20181208002122.b84a40b86f4225c9e0795ff2@kernel.org> References: <20181205101131.28996-1-bp@alien8.de> <20181205224906.824483ea3c5d1d5b7712c99a@kernel.org> <20181205142448.GH29510@zn.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181205142448.GH29510@zn.tnic> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: LKML , Andrew Banman , Dimitri Sivanich , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Mike Travis , "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" , Thomas Gleixner , Yi Wang , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:24:48 +0100 Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 10:49:06PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > I would like to put this prototype inside arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c, > > since that is locally used. > > Done. > > > Should we declare prototypes for __weak functions? Anyway, we should remove > > __weak from the prototypes. > > And done. > > Thx. OK, I think it is good to me. Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu Thanks, > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. -- Masami Hiramatsu