From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] watchdog: renesas_wdt: don't keep timer value during suspend/resume
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 17:36:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181209163632.GB1673@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb86c5d7-ab13-df05-0d0f-9dad811a6a98@roeck-us.net>
Hi Guenter,
> > I can relate to the policy argument, though. Regardless of this patch, I
> > wonder if we can make it configurable from userspace. A draft:
> >
> > #define WDIOF_RESUME_OPTS 0x0800
> >
> > #define WDIOS_RESUME_KEEP 0x0008
> > #define WDIOS_RESUME_RESET 0x0010
> >
> > and then in watchdog_ioctl() under WDIOC_SETOPTIONS:
> >
> > if (!(wdd->info->options & WDIOF_RESUME_OPTS))
> > err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > goto break;
> >
> > if (val & WDIOS_RESUME_KEEP)
> > wdd->status |= WDOG_KEEP_TIMER_WHEN_RESUME;
> >
> > if (val & WDIOS_RESUME_RESET)
> > wdd->status ~= ~WDOG_KEEP_TIMER_WHEN_RESUME;
> >
> > So, drivers with WDIOF_RESUME_OPTS could act on the
> > WDOG_KEEP_TIMER_WHEN_RESUME flag.
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
>
> Not entirely sure I understand the use case.
Well, as I mentioned before, I can understand the "isn't this policy?"
question from Fabrizio. Would be good to hear his opinion on this.
> Having said that, if we were to add this option, I think only a single
> flag would be needed - WDIOF_RESUME_KEEP. All we need to do is declare
> that a ping on resume shall be the default. Anything else would result
> in undefined per-driver default behavior.
I would very much love that. To be honest, I thought we already are in
the undefined per-driver behaviour; this is why I added two flags, to
not cause regressions. Declaring a default would be a great first step
IMHO, and then we can build the WDIOF_RESUME_KEEP option on top of it,
if needed. But for clarity, the first step seems to be a good idea in
any case, I'd say.
Thanks,
Wolfram
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-09 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-04 12:01 [RFC] watchdog: renesas_wdt: don't keep timer value during suspend/resume Wolfram Sang
2018-12-04 12:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-12-04 12:48 ` Fabrizio Castro
2018-12-04 15:20 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-07 21:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-12-08 21:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-09 16:36 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2018-12-09 18:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-09 18:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-12-10 9:37 ` Fabrizio Castro
2018-12-10 14:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-10 14:47 ` Fabrizio Castro
2018-12-10 9:40 ` Fabrizio Castro
2018-12-10 14:49 ` Fabrizio Castro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181209163632.GB1673@kunai \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.