From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: xuyandong <xuyandong2@huawei.com>
Cc: "marcel@redhat.com" <marcel@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
"wangxin (U)" <wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com>,
"Huangweidong (C)" <weidong.huang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG]Unassigned mem write during pci device hot-plug
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 21:17:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210205229-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7CECC2DFC21538489F72729DF5EFB4D908AC78EE@DGGEMM501-MBX.china.huawei.com>
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 01:47:37AM +0000, xuyandong wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 11:58:59AM +0000, xuyandong wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In our test, we configured VM with several pci-bridges and a
> > > > > virtio-net nic been attached with bus 4,
> > > > >
> > > > > After VM is startup, We ping this nic from host to judge if it is
> > > > > working normally. Then, we hot add pci devices to this VM with bus 0.
> > > > >
> > > > > We found the virtio-net NIC in bus 4 is not working (can not
> > > > > connect) occasionally, as it kick virtio backend failure with error below:
> > > > >
> > > > > Unassigned mem write 00000000fc803004 = 0x1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > memory-region: pci_bridge_pci
> > > > >
> > > > > 0000000000000000-ffffffffffffffff (prio 0, RW): pci_bridge_pci
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fc800000-00000000fc803fff (prio 1, RW): virtio-pci
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fc800000-00000000fc800fff (prio 0, RW):
> > > > > virtio-pci-common
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fc801000-00000000fc801fff (prio 0, RW):
> > > > > virtio-pci-isr
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fc802000-00000000fc802fff (prio 0, RW):
> > > > > virtio-pci-device
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fc803000-00000000fc803fff (prio 0, RW):
> > > > > virtio-pci-notify <- io mem unassigned
> > > > >
> > > > > …
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > We caught an exceptional address changing while this problem
> > > > > happened, show as
> > > > > follow:
> > > > >
> > > > > Before pci_bridge_update_mappings:
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fc000000-00000000fc1fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci
> > > > > 00000000fc000000-00000000fc1fffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fc200000-00000000fc3fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci
> > > > > 00000000fc200000-00000000fc3fffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fc400000-00000000fc5fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci
> > > > > 00000000fc400000-00000000fc5fffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fc600000-00000000fc7fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci
> > > > > 00000000fc600000-00000000fc7fffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fc800000-00000000fc9fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci
> > > > > 00000000fc800000-00000000fc9fffff
> > > > > <- correct Adress Spce
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fca00000-00000000fcbfffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci
> > > > > 00000000fca00000-00000000fcbfffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fcc00000-00000000fcdfffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci
> > > > > 00000000fcc00000-00000000fcdfffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fce00000-00000000fcffffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci
> > > > > 00000000fce00000-00000000fcffffff
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > After pci_bridge_update_mappings:
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fda00000-00000000fdbfffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fda00000-00000000fdbfffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fdc00000-00000000fddfffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fdc00000-00000000fddfffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fde00000-00000000fdffffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fde00000-00000000fdffffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fe000000-00000000fe1fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fe000000-00000000fe1fffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fe200000-00000000fe3fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fe200000-00000000fe3fffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fe400000-00000000fe5fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fe400000-00000000fe5fffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fe600000-00000000fe7fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fe600000-00000000fe7fffff
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000000fe800000-00000000fe9fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fe800000-00000000fe9fffff
> > > > >
> > > > > fffffffffc800000-fffffffffc800000 (prio 1, RW): alias
> > pci_bridge_pref_mem
> > > > > @pci_bridge_pci fffffffffc800000-fffffffffc800000 <- Exceptional Adress
> > > > Space
> > > >
> > > > This one is empty though right?
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > We have figured out why this address becomes this value,
> > > > > according to pci spec, pci driver can get BAR address size by
> > > > > writing 0xffffffff to
> > > > >
> > > > > the pci register firstly, and then read back the value from this register.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > OK however as you show below the BAR being sized is the BAR if a
> > > > bridge. Are you then adding a bridge device by hotplug?
> > >
> > > No, I just simply hot plugged a VFIO device to Bus 0, another
> > > interesting phenomenon is If I hot plug the device to other bus, this doesn't
> > happened.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > We didn't handle this value specially while process pci write in
> > > > > qemu, the function call stack is:
> > > > >
> > > > > Pci_bridge_dev_write_config
> > > > >
> > > > > -> pci_bridge_write_config
> > > > >
> > > > > -> pci_default_write_config (we update the config[address] value
> > > > > -> here to
> > > > > fffffffffc800000, which should be 0xfc800000 )
> > > > >
> > > > > -> pci_bridge_update_mappings
> > > > >
> > > > > ->pci_bridge_region_del(br, br->windows);
> > > > >
> > > > > -> pci_bridge_region_init
> > > > >
> > > > > ->
> > > > > pci_bridge_init_alias (here pci_bridge_get_base, we use the wrong
> > > > > value
> > > > > fffffffffc800000)
> > > > >
> > > > > ->
> > > > > memory_region_transaction_commit
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So, as we can see, we use the wrong base address in qemu to update
> > > > > the memory regions, though, we update the base address to
> > > > >
> > > > > The correct value after pci driver in VM write the original value
> > > > > back, the virtio NIC in bus 4 may still sends net packets
> > > > > concurrently with
> > > > >
> > > > > The wrong memory region address.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > We have tried to skip the memory region update action in qemu
> > > > > while detect pci write with 0xffffffff value, and it does work,
> > > > > but
> > > > >
> > > > > This seems to be not gently.
> > > >
> > > > For sure. But I'm still puzzled as to why does Linux try to size the
> > > > BAR of the bridge while a device behind it is used.
> > > >
> > > > Can you pls post your QEMU command line?
> > >
> > > My QEMU command line:
> > > /root/xyd/qemu-system-x86_64 -name guest=Linux,debug-threads=on -S
> > > -object
> > > secret,id=masterKey0,format=raw,file=/var/run/libvirt/qemu/domain-194-
> > > Linux/master-key.aes -machine
> > > pc-i440fx-2.8,accel=kvm,usb=off,dump-guest-core=off -cpu
> > > host,+kvm_pv_eoi -bios /usr/share/OVMF/OVMF.fd -m
> > > size=4194304k,slots=256,maxmem=33554432k -realtime mlock=off -smp
> > > 20,sockets=20,cores=1,threads=1 -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-4,mem=1024
> > > -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=5-9,mem=1024 -numa
> > > node,nodeid=2,cpus=10-14,mem=1024 -numa
> > > node,nodeid=3,cpus=15-19,mem=1024 -uuid
> > > 34a588c7-b0f2-4952-b39c-47fae3411439 -no-user-config -nodefaults
> > > -chardev
> > > socket,id=charmonitor,path=/var/run/libvirt/qemu/domain-194-Linux/moni
> > > tor.sock,server,nowait -mon
> > > chardev=charmonitor,id=monitor,mode=control -rtc base=utc -no-hpet
> > > -global kvm-pit.lost_tick_policy=delay -no-shutdown -boot strict=on
> > > -device pci-bridge,chassis_nr=1,id=pci.1,bus=pci.0,addr=0x8 -device
> > > pci-bridge,chassis_nr=2,id=pci.2,bus=pci.0,addr=0x9 -device
> > > pci-bridge,chassis_nr=3,id=pci.3,bus=pci.0,addr=0xa -device
> > > pci-bridge,chassis_nr=4,id=pci.4,bus=pci.0,addr=0xb -device
> > > pci-bridge,chassis_nr=5,id=pci.5,bus=pci.0,addr=0xc -device
> > > piix3-usb-uhci,id=usb,bus=pci.0,addr=0x1.0x2 -device
> > > usb-ehci,id=usb1,bus=pci.0,addr=0x10 -device
> > > nec-usb-xhci,id=usb2,bus=pci.0,addr=0x11 -device
> > > virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3 -device
> > > virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi1,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4 -device
> > > virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi2,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5 -device
> > > virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi3,bus=pci.0,addr=0x6 -device
> > > virtio-serial-pci,id=virtio-serial0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x7 -drive
> > > file=/mnt/sdb/xml/centos_74_x64_uefi.raw,format=raw,if=none,id=drive-v
> > > irtio-disk0,cache=none -device
> > > virtio-blk-pci,scsi=off,bus=pci.0,addr=0x2,drive=drive-virtio-disk0,id
> > > =virtio-disk0,bootindex=1 -drive
> > > if=none,id=drive-ide0-1-1,readonly=on,cache=none -device
> > > ide-cd,bus=ide.1,unit=1,drive=drive-ide0-1-1,id=ide0-1-1 -netdev
> > > tap,fd=35,id=hostnet0 -device
> > > virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=52:54:00:89:5d:8b,bus=pci.4
> > > ,addr=0x1 -chardev pty,id=charserial0 -device
> > > isa-serial,chardev=charserial0,id=serial0 -device
> > > usb-tablet,id=input0,bus=usb.0,port=1 -vnc 0.0.0.0:0 -device
> > > cirrus-vga,id=video0,vgamem_mb=8,bus=pci.0,addr=0x12 -device
> > > virtio-balloon-pci,id=balloon0,bus=pci.0,addr=0xd -msg timestamp=on
> > >
> > > I am also very curious about this issue, in the linux kernel code, maybe double
> > check in function pci_bridge_check_ranges triggered this problem.
> >
> > If you can get the stacktrace in Linux when it tries to write this fffff value, that
> > would be quite helpful.
> >
>
> After I add mdelay(100) in function pci_bridge_check_ranges, this phenomenon is
> easier to reproduce, below is my modify in kernel:
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> index cb389277..86e232d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include "pci.h"
> -
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> unsigned int pci_flags;
>
> struct pci_dev_resource {
> @@ -787,6 +787,9 @@ static void pci_bridge_check_ranges(struct pci_bus *bus)
> pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32,
> 0xffffffff);
> pci_read_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32, &tmp);
> + mdelay(100);
> + printk(KERN_ERR "sleep\n");
> + dump_stack();
> if (!tmp)
> b_res[2].flags &= ~IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
> pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32,
>
OK!
I just sent a Linux patch that should help.
I would appreciate it if you will give it a try
and if that helps reply to it with
a Tested-by: tag.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-11 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-08 11:58 [Qemu-devel] [BUG]Unassigned mem write during pci device hot-plug xuyandong
2018-12-09 14:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-10 1:59 ` xuyandong
2018-12-10 2:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-10 3:12 ` xuyandong
2018-12-10 18:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-11 1:47 ` xuyandong
2018-12-11 2:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-12-11 2:55 ` xuyandong
2018-12-11 3:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-11 3:51 ` xuyandong
2018-12-11 4:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-11 4:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-07 14:37 ` xuyandong
2019-01-07 15:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-07 15:28 ` xuyandong
2019-01-07 16:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-07 14:51 ` xuyandong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181210205229-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=weidong.huang@huawei.com \
--cc=xuyandong2@huawei.com \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.