From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: dm: fix inflight IO check Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:32:05 -0500 Message-ID: <20181211003204.GA14673@redhat.com> References: <4fec4b01-35f9-8008-22ec-2ac8af58b854@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4fec4b01-35f9-8008-22ec-2ac8af58b854@kernel.dk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Jens Axboe Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , device-mapper development , Christoph Hellwig List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Mon, Dec 10 2018 at 5:45pm -0500, Jens Axboe wrote: > After switching to percpu inflight counters, the inflight check > is totally buggy. It's perfectly valid for some counters to be > non-zero while having a total inflight IO count of 0, that's how > these kinds of counters work (inc on one CPU, dec on another). > Fix the md_in_flight() check to sum all counters before returning > a false positive, potentially. > > While at it, remove the inflight read for IO completion. We don't > need it, just wake anyone that's waiting for the IO count to drop > to zero. The caller needs to re-check that value anyway when woken, > which it does. > > Fixes: 6f75723190d8 ("dm: remove the pending IO accounting") > Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe I'm seeing that device-mapper-test-suite's "resize_io" test doesn't pass. Glad this resolves the xfstest issue but I think more work is needed, so I'll build any additional changes on this fix. Thanks. Acked-by: Mike Snitzer > > --- > > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c > index 70568f8b6c53..79ad4b3d215c 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/dm.c > +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c > @@ -650,14 +650,14 @@ static bool md_in_flight(struct mapped_device *md) > { > int cpu; > struct hd_struct *part = &dm_disk(md)->part0; > + long sum = 0; > > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { > - if (part_stat_local_read_cpu(part, in_flight[0], cpu) || > - part_stat_local_read_cpu(part, in_flight[1], cpu)) > - return true; > + sum += part_stat_local_read_cpu(part, in_flight[0], cpu); > + sum += part_stat_local_read_cpu(part, in_flight[1], cpu); > } > > - return false; > + return sum != 0; > } Heh, amazing any tests passed.. sorry for this