All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: for-next hangs on test srp/012
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:27:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181212002759.GC20445@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVObwybJ1hmekS_bJ05zrOawoG33MQDVda+W1ATa+SqNCw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 11 2018 at  7:19pm -0500,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 8:04 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/11/18 3:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > Hi Jens,
> > >
> > > If I run the following subset of blktests:
> > >
> > >   while :; do ./check -q srp && ./check -q nvmeof-mp; done
> > >
> > > against today's for-next branch (commit dd2bf2df85a7) then after some
> > > time the following hang is reported:
> > >
> > > INFO: task fio:14869 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> > >       Not tainted 4.20.0-rc6-dbg+ #1
> > > "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > > fio             D25272 14869  14195 0x00000000
> > > Call Trace:
> > >  __schedule+0x401/0xe50
> > >  schedule+0x4e/0xd0
> > >  io_schedule+0x21/0x50
> > >  blk_mq_get_tag+0x46d/0x640
> > >  blk_mq_get_request+0x7c0/0xa00
> > >  blk_mq_make_request+0x241/0xa70
> > >  generic_make_request+0x411/0x950
> > >  submit_bio+0x9b/0x250
> > >  blkdev_direct_IO+0x7fb/0x870
> > >  generic_file_direct_write+0x119/0x210
> > >  __generic_file_write_iter+0x11c/0x280
> > >  blkdev_write_iter+0x13c/0x220
> > >  aio_write+0x204/0x310
> > >  io_submit_one+0x9c6/0xe70
> > >  __x64_sys_io_submit+0x115/0x340
> > >  do_syscall_64+0x71/0x210
> > >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> > >
> > > When that hang occurs my list-pending-block-requests script does not show
> > > any pending requests:
> > >
> > > # list-pending-block-requests
> > > dm-0
> > > loop0
> > > loop1
> > > loop2
> > > loop3
> > > loop4
> > > loop5
> > > loop6
> > > loop7
> > > nullb0
> > > nullb1
> > > sda
> > > sdb
> > > sdc
> > > sdd
> > > vda
> > > vdb
> > >
> > > Enabling fail_if_no_path mode did not resolve the hang so I don't think
> > > that the root cause is in any of the dm drivers used in this test:
> > >
> > > # dmsetup ls | while read dm rest; do dmsetup message $dm 0 fail_if_no_path; done; dmsetup remove_all; dmsetup table
> > > 360014056e756c6c62300000000000000: 0 65536 multipath 0 1 alua 1 1 service-time 0 1 2 8:16 1 1
> > >
> > > The same test passes against kernel v4.20-rc6.
> >
> > What device is this being run on?
> 
> I saw this issue on usb storage too.
> 
> Seems it is introduced by commit ea86ea2cdced ("sbitmap: ammortize cost of
> clearing bits"). When the IO hang happens, .cleared is 2, and .busy is 0 on
> the sched_tag's sbitmap queue.

You saw this running the same tests as Bart?

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-12  0:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-11 22:58 for-next hangs on test srp/012 Bart Van Assche
2018-12-11 23:05 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-12-11 23:09   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-11 23:09     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-12  0:22     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-12-12  0:02 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-12  0:18   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-12  0:19   ` Ming Lei
2018-12-12  0:27     ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2018-12-12  0:38       ` Ming Lei
2018-12-12  1:05         ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-12  1:23           ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-12  1:36             ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-12  1:43               ` Ming Lei
2018-12-12  1:44                 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-12  1:49                 ` Ming Lei
2018-12-12  2:03                   ` Ming Lei
2018-12-12  2:25                     ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-12  4:28                       ` Ming Lei
2018-12-12  1:37             ` Ming Lei
2018-12-12  1:39               ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181212002759.GC20445@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.