From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rcu: add sparse check to rcu_assign_pointer
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 18:47:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181213024703.GG4170@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181212223710.215094-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:37:10PM -0800, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> rcu_assign_pointer currently doesn't do any sparse checking on a pointer
> assigned. So its possible that a pointer that is not __rcu annotated is
> assigned with rcu_assign_pointer without sparse complainting.
> rcu_dereference already does such checking so lets also make
> rcu_assign_pointer to do the same. The extra error could be helpful in
> cases where an RCU pointer is assigned with rcu_assign_pointer but not
> annotated with __rcu.
>
> This doesn't generate any code in the normal case because __CHECKER__ is
> defined only in the context of sparse.
>
> Also we rename rcu_dereference_sparse to rcu_check_parse since the
> checking now happens not only during derereferencing but also during
> assignment.
>
> Test: Introduced an rcu_assign_pointer in code and checked the output of
> sparse with and without this change. The change correctly causes sparse
> to throw an error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Applied with some commit-log fixes, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 4db8bcacc51a..9e6f10da7f26 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -309,16 +309,16 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
> */
>
> #ifdef __CHECKER__
> -#define rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space) \
> +#define rcu_check_sparse(p, space) \
> ((void)(((typeof(*p) space *)p) == p))
> #else /* #ifdef __CHECKER__ */
> -#define rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space)
> +#define rcu_check_sparse(p, space)
> #endif /* #else #ifdef __CHECKER__ */
>
> #define __rcu_access_pointer(p, space) \
> ({ \
> typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (typeof(*p) *__force)READ_ONCE(p); \
> - rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space); \
> + rcu_check_sparse(p, space); \
> ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(_________p1)); \
> })
> #define __rcu_dereference_check(p, c, space) \
> @@ -326,13 +326,13 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
> /* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
> typeof(*p) *________p1 = (typeof(*p) *__force)READ_ONCE(p); \
> RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!(c), "suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage"); \
> - rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space); \
> + rcu_check_sparse(p, space); \
> ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(________p1)); \
> })
> #define __rcu_dereference_protected(p, c, space) \
> ({ \
> RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!(c), "suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage"); \
> - rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space); \
> + rcu_check_sparse(p, space); \
> ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
> })
> #define rcu_dereference_raw(p) \
> @@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
> #define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
> ({ \
> uintptr_t _r_a_p__v = (uintptr_t)(v); \
> + rcu_check_sparse(p, __rcu); \
> \
> if (__builtin_constant_p(v) && (_r_a_p__v) == (uintptr_t)NULL) \
> WRITE_ONCE((p), (typeof(p))(_r_a_p__v)); \
> @@ -785,7 +786,7 @@ static inline notrace void rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(void)
> */
> #define RCU_INIT_POINTER(p, v) \
> do { \
> - rcu_dereference_sparse(p, __rcu); \
> + rcu_check_sparse(p, __rcu); \
> WRITE_ONCE(p, RCU_INITIALIZER(v)); \
> } while (0)
>
> --
> 2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-13 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-12 22:37 [PATCH RFC] rcu: add sparse check to rcu_assign_pointer Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-12-13 2:47 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181213024703.GG4170@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.